Association of multiple pregnancies with risk of preterm birth in the United States: a retrospective cohort study
Highlight box
Key findings
• Multiple pregnancies (MPs) are associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB), and the greater the number of fetuses, the higher the risk of PTB.
What is known and what is new?
• All studies have only described the actual phenomenon of higher rates of PTB in mothers with MPs, while no studies have focused on the specific association between MPs and PTB.
• MPs were strongly associated with an increased risk of PTB based on a large-scale data from the United States. And the rate of PTB increased significantly with the number of fetuses.
What is the implication, and what should change now?
• MPs can increase the risk of PTB, indicating that women with MPs may benefit from targeted prevention strategies to mitigate this risk. Our findings may contribute to offer reference for future research on the pathogenesis of PTB in MPs.
Introduction
Preterm birth (PTB) is defined as birth before 37 weeks’ gestation (1,2). Recent data from the National Vital Statistics System (NVSS) showed the percentage of newborns delivered preterm rose 4% in 2021, from 10.09% in 2020 to 10.49% of all births (3). PTB is a major contributor to perinatal mortality and morbidity, representing roughly 35% of deaths in this population (4). Therefore, it is critical to make continued efforts to identify modifiable and preventable risk factors of PTB.
The prevalence of multiple pregnancies (MPs) in the United States (US) has risen substantially in recent years, influenced by factors such as delayed childbearing and advancements in fertility treatments (5). According to NVSS statistics, the birth rate of twins and triplets and higher-order multiple birth rate increased by 2% in 2021 compared to 2020 (3). One possible reason is that mothers are getting older to conceive in the current social environment (6). And another reason is the rising incidence of infertility, leading to more mothers receiving infertility treatment (especially assisted reproductive technology) to become pregnant successfully, which has also led to an increase in MPs. MPs are linked to a heightened risk of morbidity and mortality in both fetuses and infants (7), including an estimated fivefold rise in stillbirth risk and a sevenfold increase in neonatal death risk, primarily due to complications related to PTB (8). In addition, MPs significantly increase costs in the antenatal and neonatal periods, in large part due to the costs associated with preterm (9). The average first-year medical costs in care for preterm infants are 10 times higher than for full-term infants (10), which has greatly increased the financial burden on families and the country.
Common reasons for PTB include pre-eclampsia or eclampsia, as well as intrauterine growth restriction. The risk factors for spontaneous PTB include a previous history of PTB, black race, periodontal disease, maternal sexually transmitted infections, smoking during pregnancy, and a low maternal body mass index (BMI) (1,2,10,11). Most of these studies have focused on singleton pregnancies and PTB, however, studies examining the association between MPs and PTB are limited. Furthermore, previously published studies have only illustrated higher rates of PTB in MPs (5,6,12,13), but they did not specify the risk degree associated with MPs compared to those of single pregnancies. Therefore, real-world studies based on a large sample size in nationwide and combined multi-dimensional variables are essential to clarifying how MPs may lead to PTB. Thus, in this cohort study, we utilized nationwide birth data from the US to investigate the relationship between MPs and the risk of PTB in over 22 million mother-infant pairs. The results of this study may allow us to understand the extent of the risk of PTB in different MPs relative to single pregnancies, and provide reference value for prenatal and perinatal management planning formulation, so as to reduce the risk of PTB in MPs. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2024-518/rc).
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis using nationwide birth certificate data from the NVSS, spanning January 2016 to December 2021, which provides the most complete data on births and deaths from 50 states and the District of Columbia in the US. The NVSS represents the oldest and most successful example of intergovernmental data sharing in public health. The collaborative relationships, established standards, and procedures create the framework through which the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) collects and disseminates the nation’s official vital statistics. Standardized forms for data collection and model procedures for uniform event registration are developed and recommended for nationwide implementation through cooperative efforts between jurisdictions and the NCHS. The NVSS provides a complete enumeration of vital events (births, deaths, marriages, etc.) across all US registration areas, with national representation. Vital events are registered by law, ensuring near-complete coverage. The data is collected by medical professionals, funeral directors, or hospital staff based on the 2003 revision electronic registration standard to improve timeliness and accuracy, and is filed by healthcare providers. All states and territories are required to adopt the standardized certificates. States transmit data to NCHS, which performs additional validation before national publication to protect respondent confidentiality and assure data quality. No sampling is used for core data collection. In this study, we used birth data, including all 22,669,736 mothers who had a live birth with available data on number of fetuses and gestational age at birth. This study was approved as exempt from review and informed consent requirements by the institutional review board at the Guangzhou Women and Children’s Medical Center because it used public database data. This study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.
Exposure measurement and outcome
Exposure measurement in our study was MPs (twin, triplet, and quadruplet or higher). Information on MPs were collected directly from the medical record in facility worksheet. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of PTB, defined as a gestational age of less than 37 weeks. Gestational age was determined using the obstetric estimate of gestation at delivery, which was directly obtained from the worksheet. Secondary outcomes included extremely PTB (less than 28 weeks gestation), very PTB (28 to 31 weeks gestation), and moderate PTB (32 to 36 weeks gestation).
Covariates
Data on age, race or ethnicity, nativity, pre-pregnancy BMI, maternal education, marital status, and smoking during pregnancy were obtained using the standardized Mother’s Worksheet during birth registration. Information regarding previous PTB, history of cesarean delivery, pre-pregnancy diabetes, pre-pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, infertility treatment, prenatal care, and maternal sexually transmitted infections (such as gonorrhea, syphilis, or chlamydia) was sourced from the facility worksheet, which is directly derived from the medical records.
Statistical analysis
We assessed the maternal characteristics and distribution of sociodemographic and according to MPs and PTB, respectively. Comparisons between categorical variables were conducted using Chi-squared (χ2) tests. We calculated the risk of PTB for mothers with MPs (twin, triplet, and quadruplet or higher) with those with single pregnancy, respectively. We also compared the risk of PTB for mothers with any kinds of MPs compared with single pregnancy. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of PTB were estimated by multivariable logistic regression models. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to calculate ORs and 95% CIs for the subtypes of PTB (i.e., extremely PTB, very PTB, and moderately PTB).
In model 1, we adjusted for maternal age (<25, 25–34, ≥35 years), and race or ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian). In model 2, we further adjusted for mother’s nativity (born in the US, born outside the US), maternal education level (less than high school, high school, more than high school), marital status (married, unmarried), previous history of PTB (yes, no), previous history of cesarean (yes, no), pre-pregnancy BMI (underweight, <18.5 kg/m2; normal weight, 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; overweight, 25.0–29.9 kg/m2; obesity, ≥30.0 kg/m2), pre-pregnancy diabetes (yes, no), pre-pregnancy hypertension (yes, no), gestational diabetes (yes, no), gestational hypertension (yes, no), eclampsia (yes, no), infertility treatment (yes, no), smoking during pregnancy (yes, no), prenatal care (yes, no), gonorrhea (yes, no), syphilis (yes, no), and chlamydia (yes, no). The variables mentioned above were selected based on univariate analysis and review of the literature. We used the R2 to assess the model fit assessment of model 2.
We performed stratified analyses based on age and race or ethnicity to investigate whether the relationship between MPs and PTB varied across these demographic factors. The P value for interaction was calculated using multivariable logistic regression models that included multiplicative interaction terms.
We performed sensitivity analyses by excluding pregnant women who receive infertility treatment because these women are more likely to have MPs. We performed another sensitivity analysis by excluding pregnant women with gestational complication (gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, or eclampsia) due to these women are more likely to experience PTB. In addition, due to a woman may had more than one pregnancy over a 6-year period [2016–2021], we further conducted a sensitivity analysis using data from each year. Two-sided P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistic 27.0.
Results
This study involved 22,669,736 mothers who gave birth to live infants. The mean [standard deviation (SD)] age was 29.05 (5.8) years; 5,365,989 (23.7%) mothers identified as Hispanic, 11,680,688 mothers (51.5%) as non-Hispanic White, 3,269,219 (14.4%) as non-Hispanic Black, and 1,418,537 (6.3%) as non-Hispanic Asian (Table 1). Among the mothers, 732,289 (3.2%) were twin pregnancy, 19,573 (0.1%) were triplet pregnancy, and 1,066 (<0.1%) were quadruplet or higher pregnancy. Among the newborns, 2,683,587 (11.8%) were categorized as PTB.
Table 1
Variables | Total | Single | MPs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Twin pregnancy | Triplet pregnancy | Quadruplet or more pregnancy | |||
All population | 22,669,736 (100.0) | 21,916,808 (100.0) | 732,289 (100.0) | 19,573 (100.0) | 1,066 (100.0) |
Age (years) | |||||
<25 | 5,394,462 (23.8) | 5,274,402 (24.1) | 118,093 (16.1) | 1,881 (9.6) | 86 (8.1) |
25–34 | 13,097,749 (57.8) | 12,650,662 (57.7) | 434,466 (59.3) | 11,909 (60.8) | 712 (66.8) |
≥35 | 4,177,525 (18.4) | 3,991,744 (18.2) | 179,730 (24.5) | 5,783 (29.5) | 268 (25.1) |
Race or ethnicity | |||||
Hispanic | 5,365,989 (23.7) | 5,236,460 (23.9) | 126,611 (17.3) | 2,758 (14.1) | 160 (15.0) |
Non-Hispanic | |||||
White | 11,680,688 (51.5) | 11,266,023 (51.4) | 402,563 (55.0) | 11,392 (58.2) | 710 (66.6) |
Black | 3,269,219 (14.4) | 3,130,867 (14.3) | 135,277 (18.5) | 2,911 (14.9) | 164 (15.4) |
Asian | 1,418,537 (6.3) | 1,382,309 (6.3) | 35,361 (4.8) | 860 (4.4) | 7 (0.7) |
Others | 728,635 (3.2) | 703,061 (3.2) | 24,190 (3.3) | 1,363 (7.0) | 21 (2.0) |
Missing | 206,668 (0.9) | 198,088 (0.9) | 8,287 (1.1) | 289 (1.5) | 4 (0.4) |
Mother’s nativity | |||||
Born in the US | 1,7501,235 (77.2) | 16,896,294 (77.1) | 588,951 (80.4) | 15,222 (77.8) | 768 (72.0) |
Born outside the US | 5,121,322 (22.6) | 4,975,161 (22.7) | 141,548 (19.3) | 4,315 (22.0) | 298 (28.0) |
Missing | 47,179 (0.2) | 45,353 (0.2) | 1,790 (0.2) | 36 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
PTB | |||||
Yes | 2,683,587 (11.8) | 2,242,028 (10.2) | 422,097 (57.6) | 18,446 (94.2) | 1,016 (95.3) |
No | 19,986,149 (88.2) | 19,674,780 (89.8) | 310,192 (42.4) | 1,127 (5.8) | 50 (4.7) |
Education levels | |||||
Lower than high school | 2,801,648 (12.4) | 2,733,015 (12.5) | 67,178 (9.2) | 1,401 (7.2) | 54 (5.1) |
High school | 5,783,806 (25.5) | 5,614,976 (25.6) | 165,122 (22.5) | 3,509 (17.9) | 199 (18.7) |
Higher than high school | 13,769,913 (60.7) | 13,268,269 (60.5) | 486,600 (66.4) | 14,248 (72.8) | 796 (74.7) |
Missing | 314,369 (1.4) | 300,548 (1.4) | 13,389 (1.8) | 415 (2.1) | 17 (1.6) |
Marital status | |||||
Married | 12,238,999 (54.0) | 11,797,970 (53.8) | 426,412 (58.2) | 13,747 (70.2) | 870 (81.6) |
Unmarried | 8,212,193 (36.2) | 7,967,720 (36.4) | 240,038 (32.8) | 4,307 (22.0) | 128 (12.0) |
Missing | 2,218,544 (9.8) | 2,151,118 (9.8) | 65,839 (9.0) | 1,519 (7.8) | 68 (6.4) |
Pre-pregnancy BMI | |||||
Underweight | 688,510 (3.0) | 671,709 (3.1) | 16,358 (2.2) | 431 (2.2) | 12 (1.1) |
Normal weight | 9,235,434 (40.7) | 8,958,859 (40.9) | 268,947 (36.7) | 7,236 (37.0) | 392 (36.8) |
Overweight | 5,920,679 (26.1) | 5,725,217 (26.1) | 190,169 (26.0) | 5,043 (25.8) | 250 (23.5) |
Obesity | 6,300,997 (27.8) | 6,056,581 (27.6) | 237,690 (32.5) | 6,354 (32.5) | 372 (34.9) |
Missing | 524,116 (2.3) | 504,442 (2.3) | 19,125 (2.6) | 509 (2.6) | 40 (3.8) |
Pre-pregnancy diabetes | |||||
Yes | 219,451 (1.0) | 211,380 (1.0) | 7,764 (1.1) | 295 (1.5) | 12 (1.1) |
No | 22,426,628 (98.9) | 21,682,431 (98.9) | 723,882 (98.9) | 19,262 (98.4) | 1,053 (98.8) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
Pre-pregnancy hypertension | |||||
Yes | 494,272 (2.2) | 468,921 (2.1) | 24,448 (3.3) | 835 (4.3) | 68 (6.4) |
No | 22,151,807 (97.7) | 21,424,890 (97.8) | 707,198 (96.6) | 18,722 (95.7) | 997 (93.5) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
Smoking during pregnancy | |||||
Yes | 1,381,822 (6.1) | 1,337,591 (6.1) | 43,408 (5.9) | 816 (4.2) | 7 (0.7) |
No | 21,182,012 (93.4) | 20,476,972 (93.4) | 685,306 (93.6) | 18,683 (95.5) | 1,051 (98.6) |
Missing | 105,902 (0.5) | 102,245 (0.5) | 3,575 (0.5) | 74 (0.4) | 8 (0.8) |
Gestational diabetes | |||||
Yes | 1,578,040 (7.0) | 1,509,114 (6.9) | 66,622 (9.1) | 2,204 (11.3) | 100 (9.4) |
No | 21,068,039 (92.9) | 20,384,697 (93.0) | 665,024 (90.8) | 17,353 (88.7) | 965 (90.5) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
Gestational hypertension | |||||
Yes | 1,687,277 (7.4) | 1,583,493 (7.2) | 100,292 (13.7) | 3,303 (16.9) | 189 (17.7) |
No | 20,958,802 (92.5) | 20,310,318 (92.7) | 631,354 (86.2) | 16,254 (83.0) | 876 (82.2) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
Eclampsia | |||||
Yes | 61,244 (0.3) | 56,415 (0.3) | 4,695 (0.6) | 134 (0.7) | 0 (0.0) |
No | 22,584,835 (99.6) | 21,837,396 (99.6) | 726,951 (99.3) | 19,423 (99.2) | 1,065 (99.9) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
History of preterm | |||||
Yes | 7,923,99 (3.5) | 749,453 (3.4) | 41,398 (5.7) | 1,420 (7.3) | 128 (12.0) |
No | 21,853,680 (96.4) | 21,144,358 (96.5) | 690,248 (94.3) | 18,137 (92.7) | 937 (87.9) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
Infertility treatment | |||||
Yes | 445,616 (2.0) | 347,749 (1.6) | 90,960 (12.4) | 6,362 (32.5) | 545 (51.1) |
No | 22,200,463 (97.9) | 21,546,062 (98.3) | 640,686 (87.5) | 13,195 (67.4) | 520 (48.8) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
Chlamydia | |||||
Yes | 415,924 (1.8) | 404,776 (1.8) | 10,974 (1.5) | 168 (0.9) | 6 (0.6) |
No | 22,189,014 (97.9) | 21,450,155 (97.9) | 718,491 (98.1) | 19,309 (98.7) | 1,059 (99.3) |
Missing | 64,798 (0.3) | 61,877 (0.3) | 2,824 (0.4) | 96 (0.5) | 1 (0.1) |
Gonorrhea | |||||
Yes | 71,466 (0.3) | 69,223 (0.3) | 2,204 (0.3) | 39 (0.2) | 0 (0.0) |
No | 22,533,472 (99.4) | 21,785,708 (99.4) | 727,261 (99.3) | 19,438 (99.3) | 1,065 (99.9) |
Missing | 64,798 (0.3) | 61,877 (0.3) | 2,824 (0.4) | 96 (0.5) | 1 (0.1) |
Syphilis | |||||
Yes | 31,659 (0.1) | 30,571 (0.1) | 1,058 (0.1) | 25 (0.1) | 5 (0.5) |
No | 22,573,279 (99.6) | 21,824,360 (99.6) | 728,407 (99.5) | 19,452 (99.4) | 1,060 (99.4) |
Missing | 64,798 (0.3) | 61,877 (0.3) | 2,824 (0.4) | 96 (0.5) | 1 (0.1) |
Previous cesareans | |||||
Yes | 3,506,285 (15.5) | 3,373,740 (15.4) | 128,825 (17.6) | 3,513 (17.9) | 207 (19.4) |
No | 19,139,794 (84.4) | 18,520,071 (84.5) | 602,821 (82.3) | 16,044 (82.0) | 858 (80.5) |
Missing | 23,657 (0.1) | 22,997 (0.1) | 643 (0.1) | 16 (0.1) | 1 (0.1) |
Prenatal care | |||||
Yes | 21,719,339 (95.8) | 21,001,475 (95.8) | 698,325 (95.4) | 18,563 (94.8) | 976 (91.6) |
No | 405,437 (1.8) | 393,123 (1.8) | 11,964 (1.6) | 321 (1.6) | 29 (2.7) |
Missing | 544,960 (2.4) | 522,210 (2.4) | 22,000 (3.0) | 689 (3.5) | 61 (5.7) |
Data are presented as n (%). BMI, body mass index; MPs, multiple pregnancies; PTB, preterm birth; US, United States.
The rate of PTB was 10.2% (2,242,028 of 21,916,808 births), 57.6% (422,097 of 732,289), 94.2% (18,446 of 19,573), and 95.3% (1,016 of 1,066) for women with single, twin, triplet and quadruplet or higher, respectively. In addition, MPs had higher very and extremely PB rate (18.9% in twin, 38.4% in triplet, and 77.9% in quadruplet or higher) compared with single pregnancy (15.2%).
Higher rates of twin, triplet, and quadruplet or higher pregnancies were found among mothers with age 25–34 years [e.g., twin: 434,466 (3.3%) vs. age <25 years, 118,093 (2.2%)], the Black women [135,277 (4.1%) vs. the White women, 402,563 (3.4%)], women with higher education [higher than high school, 486,600 (3.5%) vs. high school, 165,122 (2.9%)], women who were married [426,412 (3.5%) vs. unmarried, 240,038 (2.9%)], women who not smoked during pregnancy [685,306 (3.2%) vs. yes, 43,408 (3.1%)], women with previous history of preterm [41,398 (5.2%) vs. no, 690,248 (3.2%)], women with history of cesarean [128,825 (3.7%) vs. no, 602,821 (3.1%)], or women who received prenatal care [698,325 (3.2%) vs. not, 11,964 (2.9%)] (Table 1). Table S1 listed the population characteristics based on PTB and PTB subcategories.
In the all population, mothers who with MPs had an increased risk of PTB compared with mothers with single pregnancy. The adjusted OR of PTB was 12.03 (95% CI: 11.97–12.10) for twin, 139.08 (95% CI: 130.43–148.30) for triplet, 161.17 (95% CI: 118.80–218.65) for quadruplet or higher, and 12.51 (95% CI: 12.44–12.58) for any kinds of MPs after adjustment for age, race or ethnicity, nativity, education, marital status, previous history of PTB and cesareans, infertility treatment, pre-pregnancy BMI, pre-pregnancy diabetes, pre-pregnancy hypertension, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, eclampsia, smoking during pregnancy, chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and prenatal care (Table 2). In addition, we subdivided PTB into three degrees: moderately, very, and extremely PTB. We identified a significant association among all three kinds of MPs evaluated with moderate, severe, and extreme PTB. The adjusted OR of moderately PTB was 11.43 (95% CI: 11.36–11.49) for twin, 102.00 (95% CI: 95.53–108.91) for triplet, and 41.24 (95% CI: 29.50–57.65) for quadruplet or higher; the adjusted OR of very PTB was 14.11 (95% CI: 13.94–14.29) for twin, 374.22 (95% CI: 348.26–402.10) for triplet, and 806.36 (95% CI: 586.99–1,107.69) for quadruplet or higher; the adjusted OR of extremely PTB was 15.22 (95% CI: 14.99–15.46) for twin, 313.30 (95% CI: 288.88–339.79) for triplet, and 1,017.26 (95% CI: 733.29–1,411.18) for quadruplet or higher. Significant associations of any kinds of MPs with three kinds of degree of PTB were also found. The adjusted OR of moderately, very and extremely PTB were 11.76 (95% CI: 11.69–11.82), 15.40 (95% CI: 15.22–15.59) and 16.42 (95% CI: 16.18–16.67) for any MPs (Table 2), respectively.
Table 2
Models | PTB | PTB categories | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Moderately PTB | Very PTB | Extremely PTB | ||
Twin pregnancy | ||||
Not adjusted | 11.95 (11.89–12.01) | 11.43 (11.37–11.49) | 14.54 (14.39–14.69) | 15.38 (15.18–15.58) |
Model 1 | 11.94 (11.88–12.00) | 11.39 (11.34–11.45) | 14.69 (14.54–14.84) | 15.68 (15.48–15.89) |
Model 2 | 12.03 (11.97–12.10) | 11.43 (11.36–11.49) | 14.11 (13.94–14.29) | 15.22 (14.99–15.46) |
Triplet pregnancy | ||||
Not adjusted | 145.31 (136.78–154.38) | 105.61 (99.30–112.31) | 387.437 (362.89–413.64) | 332.43 (309.48–357.07) |
Model 1 | 145.34 (136.80–154.41) | 105.13 (98.85–111.81) | 394.29 (369.30–420.98) | 341.10 (317.51–366.45) |
Model 2 | 139.08 (130.43–148.30) | 102.00 (95.53–108.91) | 374.22 (348.26–402.10) | 313.30 (288.88–339.79) |
Quadruplet or more pregnancy | ||||
Not adjusted | 189.54 (141.48–253.92) | 49.49 (36.14–67.76) | 883.88 (654.58–1,193.49) | 1,124.59 (828.73–1,526.07) |
Model 1 | 191.20 (142.72–256.15) | 49.47 (36.13–67.74) | 910.27 (674.10–1,229.17) | 1,182.97 (871.65–1,605.47) |
Model 2 | 161.17 (118.80–218.65) | 41.24 (29.50–57.65) | 806.36 (586.99–1,107.69) | 1,017.26 (733.29–1,411.18) |
Any MPs | ||||
Not adjusted | 12.45 (12.39–12.51) | 11.77 (11.71–11.83) | 16.01 (15.85–16.17) | 16.68 (16.47–16.90) |
Model 1 | 12.44 (12.38–12.50) | 11.74 (11.68–11.79) | 16.16 (16.00–16.33) | 17.01 (16.79–17.22) |
Model 2 | 12.51 (12.44–12.58) | 11.76 (11.69–11.82) | 15.40 (15.22–15.59) | 16.42 (16.18–16.67) |
Data are presented as OR (95% CI). Model 1: age and race or ethnicity were adjusted in this model. Model 2: model 1 + nativity, education, marital status, pre-pregnancy BMI, previous history of cesarean, previous history of PTB, pre-pregnancy diabetes, pre-pregnancy hypertension, infertility treatment, smoking during pregnancy, prenatal care, and sexually transmitted diseases (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis) were adjusted. BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; MPs, multiple pregnancies; OR, odds ratio; PTB, preterm birth; US, United States.
In the stratified analyses by age, significant associations with PTB were observed for MPs in all age groups. The adjusted OR for any MPs was 14.24 (95% CI: 14.06–14.43), 13.25 (95% CI: 13.15–13.34), and 10.01 (95% CI: 9.89–10.12) among mothers younger than age 25, 25–34, and 35 years or older, respectively (Table 3). We also found MPs increased the risk of PTB among Hispanic (OR, 8.55; 95% CI: 8.45–8.65), non-Hispanic White (OR, 13.53; 95% CI: 13.45–13.62), non-Hispanic Black (OR, 9.52; 95% CI: 9.41–9.64), and non-Hispanic Asian (OR, 11.71; 95% CI: 11.42–12.01) mothers. Due to the small sample size of quadruplet or higher in Asian mothers, leading to the results were less stable (Table 4).
Table 3
Age (years) | Case/total† | Adjusted OR (95% CI)‡ | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Twin pregnancy | |||
<25 | 742,99/118,010 | 13.91 (13.73–14.10) | |
25–34 | 246,779/434,210 | 12.71 (12.62–12.80) | <0.001 |
≥35 | 101,019/179,635 | 9.56 (9.45–9.67) | |
Triplet pregnancy | |||
<25 | 1,776/1,879 | 134.84 (110.03–165.25) | |
25–34 | 11,250/11,899 | 163.38 (149.35–176.54) | <0.001 |
≥35 | 5,420/5,781 | 102.24 (91.10–114.74) | |
Quadruplet or more pregnancy | |||
<25 | 77/86 | 75.35 (37.44–151.67) | |
25–34 | 683/709 | 209.40 (138.87–315.75) | <0.001 |
≥35 | 256/268 | 127.55 (69.26–234.89) | |
Any MPs | |||
<25 | 76,152/119,975 | 14.24 (14.06–14.43) | |
25–34 | 258,712/446,818 | 13.25 (13.15–13.34) | <0.001 |
≥35 | 106,695/185,684 | 10.01 (9.89–10.12) |
†, the case totals represent the number of PTB instances among mothers with MPs, while the total indicates the overall number of mothers with MPs in the cohort. ‡, adjusted for ethnicity or race, marital status, nativity, education, pre-pregnancy BMI, previous history of cesarean, previous history of PTB, pre-pregnancy hypertension, pre-pregnancy diabetes, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, eclampsia, infertility treatment, smoking during pregnancy, prenatal care, and sexually transmitted diseases (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis). BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; MPs, multiple pregnancies; OR, odds ratio; PTB, preterm birth.
Table 4
Race or ethnicity | Case/total† | Adjusted OR (95% CI)‡ | P value |
---|---|---|---|
Twin pregnancy | |||
Hispanic | 62,488/108,614 | 11.25 (11.11–11.40) | |
Non-Hispanic | |||
White | 294,884/519,698 | 12.98 (12.90–13.07) | |
Black | 88,391/142,962 | 9.21 (9.10–9.32) | <0.001 |
Asian | 23,107/41,919 | 11.37 (11.08–11.67) | |
Triplet pregnancy | |||
Hispanic | 2,373/2,524 | 122.80 (104.08–144.89) | |
Non-Hispanic | |||
White | 13,793/14,577 | 160.80 (149.00–173.54) | |
Black | 3,329/3,575 | 75.29 (65.80–86.16) | <0.001 |
Asian | 807/857 | 127.41 (91.15–178.09) | |
Quadruplet or more pregnancy | |||
Hispanic | 143/155 | 102.57 (56.75–185.38) | |
Non-Hispanic | |||
White | 802/837 | 183.56 (129.14–260.92) | |
Black | 186/197 | 79.98 (43.18–148.13) | <0.001 |
Asian | 14/15 | – | |
Any MPs | |||
Hispanic | 65,004/111,293 | 8.55 (8.45–8.65) | |
Non-Hispanic | |||
White | 309,479/535,112 | 13.53 (13.45–13.62) | |
Black | 91,906/146,734 | 9.52 (9.41–9.64) | <0.001 |
Asian | 23,928/42,791 | 11.71 (11.42–12.01) |
†, the case totals represent the number of PTB instances among mothers with MPs, while the total indicates the overall number of mothers with MPs in the cohort. ‡, adjusted for age, nativity, education, marital status, pre-pregnancy BMI, previous history of cesarean, previous history of PTB, pre-pregnancy hypertension, pre-pregnancy diabetes, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes, eclampsia, infertility treatment, smoking during pregnancy, prenatal care, and sexually transmitted diseases (chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis). BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; MPs, multiple pregnancies; OR, odds ratio; PTB, preterm birth.
The results were robust in the sensitivity analyses that excluded pregnant women who received infertility treatment (Table S2). The sensitivity analyses, which included additional adjustments for pregnancy complications, produced comparable results (Table S3). Furthermore, the associations remained consistent in sensitivity analyses utilizing one year of data from 2016 to 2021 (refer to Table S4).
Discussion
By analyzing data from a national population of over 22 million women in the US, we identified a significant association between MPs and PTB. This relationship was consistent across various age, racial, and ethnic groups, and the results remained robust in sensitivity analyses.
A Previous study reported that approximately 60% of twin were born prematurely in developed countries (12), which was consistent with our results (57.6%). However, most studies focus on twin pregnancy and PTB, and researches on the association of triplets or higher and PTB are sparse, which may be limited by the low incidence of triplets or higher and thus the small sample size. In this study, we found the women with triplets and quadruplets had extremely high rates of PTB—94.2% and 95.3%, respectively. Consistent with our findings, Razavi et al. (14) reported that the PTB in triplet was 96.0% (88 cases). In addition, the rate of very PTB (from 11.7% in twin to 44.8% in quadruplets or higher) and extremely PTB (from 7.2% in twin to 33.1% in quadruplets or higher) showed a significantly increasing trend with the increase of the number of fetuses.
The direct potential mechanisms between MPs and PTB remain to be elucidated. However, MPs lead to PTB may due to their own characteristics and the pregnancy-related complications caused by them (8,13). In twin pregnancy, chorionicity is an important factors that contribute to the development of PTB (15). Compared with dichorionic twin, monochorionic diamniotic twin are at higher risk of PTB. The preterm of monochorionic diamniotic twin may associated with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, selective intrauterine growth restriction (16) and twin anemiaepolycythemia sequence (17). However, the study on chorionicity in triplets or higher is lacking. In terms of complications secondary to MPs, the frequency of uterine contractions may be a potential factor, showing that twin had higher frequency of uterine contractions compared to singletons, however, there was no difference between PTB and full-term (18). Another complication is amniotic fluid (AF) sludge which is a risk factor for PTB. A study found that twin pregnancies (78 cases) had higher prevalence of AF sludge than singleton pregnancies (34.6% vs. 22.6%) (19). In addition, women with MPs are more like to experience gestational diabetes mellitus, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, hemorrhage, and cesarean delivery, these diseases are closely associated with PTB (20-26).
This research has important clinical and public health implications. MPs significantly increases the risk of PTB compared with single pregnancy. More than half of mothers with MPs are at risk of PTB, which may increase the fetal and infant morbidity and mortality. Mothers received infertility treatment are more likely to have MPs and have significantly higher rates of PTB. This phenomenon raises the question of whether mothers undergoing infertility treatment (especially assisted reproductive technology) should opt for a single pregnancy in order to reduce the risk of PTB and ensure the health of the newborn. Additionally, multifetal reduction can lower the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery and neonatal complications by reducing the number of fetuses (5). A study found that mothers with triplets who underwent pregnancy reduction to twins experienced lower rates of PTB and antenatal complications, with a risk of PTB comparable to mothers of spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies (27). Another study found that multifetal reduction from twin to a singleton before 15-week gestation can reduce the risk of PTB (28). Multifetal reduction may decrease the risk of preeclampsia in women with higher-order multifetal gestations (29). Therefore, multifetal reduction may be a potential option to decrease the risk of PTB in MPs women. This study confirms that MPs (twin, triplets, and quadruplets) is one of the risks of PTB, which may give us some implications that mothers with MPs may need more attention and management from family, hospital, and society in life and medical care.
There are several limitations in this study. Firstly, the data on cesarean deliveries were not provided in this database. Therefore, for mothers who delivered by cesarean section, we were unable to obtain information on whether mothers passively chose to PTB or actively chose to PTB, and we were unable to perform subgroup analyses of PTB caused by cesarean and spontaneous PTB, which might have a small impact on the results. Secondly, although we adjusted for many factors, however, some other factors that closely associated with PTB were not provided in NVSS, such as vaginal bleeding, cervical length (30), maternal thyroid function (31), maternal marijuana use (32), and so on. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility of potential residual confounding arising from these factors or unknown factors. Thirdly, the data used in this study were all from the US (high-income country), reducing their applicability in other countries, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
Conclusions
In this national study based on the real-world birth data in the US, MP was associated with an increased risk of PTB. Pregnancies involving three or more fetuses were associated with exceptionally high rates of PTB, exceeding 94% in our cohort. The severity of PTB increased significantly with the number of fetuses. These findings are suggestive of women with MP warranting targeted prevention for PTB.
Acknowledgments
None.
Footnote
Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2024-518/rc
Peer Review File: Available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2024-518/prf
Funding: This study was funded by
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2024-518/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. This study was carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Soneji S, Beltrán-Sánchez H. Association of Maternal Cigarette Smoking and Smoking Cessation With Preterm Birth. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e192514. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gao R, Liu B, Yang W, et al. Association of Maternal Sexually Transmitted Infections With Risk of Preterm Birth in the United States. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2133413. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, et al. Births: Final Data for 2021. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2023;72:1-53.
- Oh KJ, Romero R, Park JY, et al. Evidence that antibiotic administration is effective in the treatment of a subset of patients with intra-amniotic infection/inflammation presenting with cervical insufficiency. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221:140.e1-140.e18. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gestations Multifetal. Twin, Triplet, and Higher-Order Multifetal Pregnancies: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 231. Obstet Gynecol 2021;137:e145-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Blondel B, Macfarlane A, Gissler M, et al. Preterm birth and multiple pregnancy in European countries participating in the PERISTAT project. BJOG 2006;113:528-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Koullali B, Oudijk MA, Nijman TA, et al. Risk assessment and management to prevent preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;21:80-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Scher AI, Petterson B, Blair E, et al. The risk of mortality or cerebral palsy in twins: a collaborative population-based study. Pediatr Res 2002;52:671-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bromer JG, Ata B, Seli M, et al. Preterm deliveries that result from multiple pregnancies associated with assisted reproductive technologies in the USA: a cost analysis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011;23:168-73. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Boardman JP. Preterm birth: causes, consequences and prevention. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008;28:559.
- Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, et al. Preterm birth 1: epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Obstet Anesth Dig 2009;29:6-7.
- Chescheir NC. Preterm birth in multiple pregnancy: a glimmer of hope? Lancet 2013;382:1314-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Fuchs F, Senat MV. Multiple gestations and preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;21:113-20. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Razavi AS, Kalish RB, Coombs S, et al. Preterm delivery in triplet pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017;30:2596-600. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Hack KE, Derks JB, Elias SG, et al. Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study. BJOG 2008;115:58-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Gratacós E, Lewi L, Muñoz B, et al. A classification system for selective intrauterine growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies according to umbilical artery Doppler flow in the smaller twin. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30:28-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Slaghekke F, Kist WJ, Oepkes D, et al. Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther 2010;27:181-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Newman RB, Iams JD, Das A, et al. A prospective masked observational study of uterine contraction frequency in twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1564-70. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Boyer A, Cameron L, Munoz-Maldonado Y, et al. Clinical significance of amniotic fluid sludge in twin pregnancies with a short cervical length. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014;211:506.e1-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sivan E, Maman E, Homko CJ, et al. Impact of fetal reduction on the incidence of gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99:91-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Schwartz DB, Daoud Y, Zazula P, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:912-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Bailit JL. Hyperemesis gravidarium: Epidemiologic findings from a large cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:811-4. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sibai BM, Hauth J, Caritis S, et al. Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Network of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:938-42. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Sheard C, Cox S, Oates M, et al. Impact of a multiple, IVF birth on post-partum mental health: a composite analysis. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2058-65. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Luke B, Brown MB. Contemporary risks of maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age and plurality. Fertil Steril 2007;88:283-93. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Conde-Agudelo A, Belizán JM, Lindmark G. Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:899-904.
- Dodd JM, Dowswell T, Crowther CA. Reduction of the number of fetuses for women with a multiple pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD003932. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Jin B, Huang Q, Ji M, et al. Perinatal outcomes in dichorionic diamniotic twins with multifetal pregnancy reduction versus expectant management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99:e20730. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Smith-Levitin M, Kowalik A, Birnholz J, et al. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies to twins improves outcome over nonreduced triplet gestations. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:878-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mailath-Pokorny M, Polterauer S, Kohl M, et al. Individualized assessment of preterm birth risk using two modified prediction models. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2015;186:42-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Wu JN, Peng T, Xie F, et al. Association of thyroid dysfunction and autoantibody positivity with the risk of preterm birth: a hospital-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022;22:473. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Conner SN, Bedell V, Lipsey K, et al. Maternal Marijuana Use and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:713-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]