Increased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very/extremely preterm infants with early hypotension: a retrospective cohort study
Original Article

Increased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very/extremely preterm infants with early hypotension: a retrospective cohort study

Liang Tang1,2,3# ORCID logo, Feng Wang2#, Ziyun Ye2#, Wanqiao Zhang4, Fan Wu3, Yuhan Chen1,4, Xiangyong Kong1,2

1The Second Clinical School of Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; 2Department of Neonatology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; 3Department of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; 4Institute of Pediatrics, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: L Tang, F Wang, Z Ye; (II) Administrative support: F Wu, Y Chen, X Kong; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: F Wu, X Kong; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Correspondence to: Fan Wu, MD. Department of Neonatology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, No. 63, Duobao Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou 510150, China. Email: gdwufan@163.com; Yuhan Chen, PhD. The Second Clinical School of Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Institute of Pediatrics, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5, Nanzhangmen Hutong, Dongsi Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100100, China. Email: mauve612@163.com; Xiangyong Kong, MD. The Second Clinical School of Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Neonatology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 5, Nanzhangmen Hutong, Dongsi Road, Dongcheng District, Beijing 100100, China. Email: sdkongxy@126.com.

Background: The relationship between neonatal early hypotension and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains uncertain, with inconsistent findings reported in previous studies. The objective of this study was to assess whether early hypotension in very/extremely preterm infants was associated with an increased risk of NEC, aiming to facilitate early detection and prevention.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed in preterm infants with gestational ages (GA) less than 32 weeks, admitted to the Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2021 through December 2023. According to the occurrence of hypotension during the first postpartum week, preterm infants were divided into hypotension group and non-hypotension groups. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software (version 26.0). The association between neonatal early hypotension and subsequent NEC occurrence was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results: A total of 355 very/extremely preterm infants were included, comprising 130 in the hypotension group and 225 in the non-hypotension group. Compared with the non-hypotension group, infants in the hypotension group had significantly higher rates of mortality, hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA), NEC, and surgically treated NEC (all P>0.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, neonatal early hypotension remained significantly associated with an increased incidence of NEC [odds ratio (OR) =2.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25–6.28, P=0.01].

Conclusions: Neonatal early hypotension is associated with an increased risk of NEC.

Keywords: Hypotension; necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC); preterm infants; neonatal complications; risk factors


Submitted Jun 21, 2025. Accepted for publication Sep 12, 2025. Published online Oct 27, 2025.

doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-416


Highlight box

Key findings

• Neonatal early hypotension is associated with an increased risk of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

What is known and what is new?

• Neonatal hypotension, defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) below that for the gestational age (GA), is a potential risk factor for developing NEC.

• Our study aims to evaluate the association between neonatal early hypotension and NEC under a more rigorous definition incorporating MAP and clinical signs of impaired perfusion.

What is the implication, and what should change now?

• Timely management of circulatory compromise and hypotension may reduce NEC incidence.

• Given the limitations of defining hypotension solely by a low MAP, a standardized assessment must also incorporate clinical signs of impaired perfusion resulting from low cardiac output for a more accurate diagnosis.


Introduction

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a severe gastrointestinal emergency in neonates, characterized by inflammation and ischemic damage to the intestinal mucosal lining. Its incidence primarily ranges from 2% to 13% among preterm infants, and the associated mortality rate varies between 20% and 45% (1,2). Surviving infants often experience severe long-term consequences, including growth impairment, and neurodevelopmental delay (3,4). Thus, identifying risk factors for NEC is crucial for decreasing associated morbidity and mortality.

The precise etiology of NEC has yet to be clearly elucidated. Historical evidence implicates numerous contributing factors, including genetic susceptibility, structural and immunological immaturity of the gastrointestinal tract, heightened reactivity of intestinal mucosa, and abnormal colonization of intestinal microbiota (5). Additionally, NEC has been linked to vascular compromise and impaired perfusion, which may initiate inflammatory cascades (6,7). Previous research suggests that neonatal hypotension and associated circulatory disturbances influencing intestinal perfusion might exacerbate NEC development (8,9). However, there is no accurate definition of hypotension in preterm infants, and it remains controversial whether hypotension is a definitive independent risk factor for NEC.

The aim of this study was to clarify the potential association between early neonatal hypotension and NEC. The results are intended to provide a foundation for clinical decision-making and to facilitate earlier and more targeted interventions aimed at reducing NEC incidence. We present this article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2025-416/rc).


Methods

Study population

This retrospective study enrolled preterm infants with a gestational age (GA) of <32 weeks who were admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) at the Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital from January 2021 to December 2023. Exclusion criteria included: (I) newborns transferred from other hospitals several days postpartum; (II) incomplete clinical data regarding the perinatal or neonatal periods; (III) prophylactic hydrocortisone administration to extremely preterm infants immediately after birth (0.5 mg/kg per 12 hours for 7 days, followed by a dose of 0.5 mg/kg per day for 3 days); and (IV) severe congenital heart defects or genetic metabolic disorders. Based on the occurrence of hypotension within the first postnatal week, infants were categorized into hypotension and non-hypotension groups. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The study protocol received approval from the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital ethics committee (No. S2025-032-01), and written informed consent was obtained from all parents/legal guardians upon their infant’s admission to the participating NICU.

Blood pressure (BP) measurement

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) values were retrieved from nursing flowsheets in electronic medical records. All invasive BP (IBP) measurements were obtained via umbilical arterial catheters (UACs) or peripheral ACs (PACs). Non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements were recorded concurrently at 6-hour intervals during the first week postnatally using a Drager Vista 120 multipara monitor (Draeger, Luebeck, Germany). Measurements displaying dampened arterial waveforms or NIBP values differing by more than 15% from paired IBP readings were excluded from the analyses to avoid potential inaccuracies.

Data collection

Clinical data on neonatal and perinatal factors of very/extremely preterm infants were retrieved from hospital inpatient records.

  • Maternal factors comprised maternal age, amniotic fluid contamination, chorioamnionitis, abnormal amniotic fluid volume, fetal intrauterine distress, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), placenta previa, placental abruption, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, prenatal infection, anemia during pregnancy, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and antenatal steroid use.
  • Neonatal factors included infant gender, GA, birth weight (BW), mode of delivery, multiple pregnancy status, in vitro fertilization (IVF) conception, Apgar scores evaluated at 1 and 5 minutes, small for gestational age (SGA), surfactant therapy, feeding methods, and routine blood parameters (including hemoglobin concentration, platelet counts, and white blood cell counts) assessed within the initial 24 hours post-delivery.
  • Neonatal outcomes, both morbidity and mortality, encompassed bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), moderate-to-severe BPD, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), pulmonary hemorrhage, invasive mechanical ventilation, hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA), neonatal sepsis, intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), severe IVH (grade III or IV), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), NEC, surgically treated NEC, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), severe ROP, and mortality rate.

Clinical definitions

Hypotension was defined as a MAP persisting below the preterm infant’s GA threshold for longer than 15 minutes, accompanied by signs of hypoperfusion such as lactic acidosis, prolonged capillary refill time, oliguria, or supportive echocardiographic findings (e.g., low cardiac output or a hsPDA) (10). Management required adherence to a standardized protocol, including administration of inotropic agents, hydrocortisone or volume expansion to elevate BP.

RDS was determined by early-onset respiratory compromise confirmed through chest X-ray findings, necessitating mechanical respiratory assistance via endotracheal intubation and surfactant replacement therapy (11).

BPD was defined as the continued need for supplementary oxygen or respiratory support beyond 28 days postnatally in infants born before 32 weeks’ gestation. Moderate BPD was defined as a required FiO2 <30%, while severe BPD indicated FiO2 ≥30% or ongoing positive pressure/mechanical ventilation at 36 weeks postmenstrual age (12).

Neonatal sepsis was defined as either the identification of pathogens in blood or cerebrospinal fluid cultures, or a laboratory-confirmed infection accompanied by non-specific systemic symptoms (13).

HsPDA diagnosis integrated echocardiographic findings with clinical features (14).

IVH was diagnosed by transcranial ultrasonography, with severe IVH defined as grade III–IV (15).

Definite NEC was characterized by a modified Bell’s staging ≥II, requiring clinical signs and symptoms along with radiographic evidence of pneumatosis intestinalis or portal venous gas (16).

Surgically treated NEC was defined as severe cases requiring surgical intervention, which encompassed either exploratory laparotomy or drainage procedure (17).

Severe ROP was determined as threshold ROP (stage ≥ III) necessitating laser or ranibizumab treatment (18).

Other clinical diagnoses adhered to established neonatal data collection protocols.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software (version 26.0). Continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) for normally distributed data or median with interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed data following normality assessment. Comparisons of continuous data between groups were performed using either the Mann-Whitney U test or independent-sample t-test, depending on data distribution. Frequencies (n) and proportions (%) were employed to summarize categorical variables, and χ2 tests were utilized to evaluate differences between groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate associations between neonatal morbidity or mortality and hypotension during the early neonatal period, adjusting for potential confounding factors. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) along with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.


Results

Comparison of participant characteristics between the two groups

A total of 355 very/extremely preterm infants were enrolled and categorized into a hypotensive group (n=130, 36.6%) and a non-hypotensive group (n=225, 63.4%). Significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of GA, BW, cesarean delivery, GDM, prenatal infections, and antenatal steroid therapy exposure (Z=4.250, P<0.001; t=2.452, P=0.02; χ2=9.481, P=0.002; χ2=7.643, P=0.006; χ2=4.128, P=0.042; χ2=4.196, P=0.041, respectively). Other clinical and demographic variables showed no statistically significant differences between the cohorts (all P>0.05). Tables 1,2 provide detailed summaries of participant characteristics.

Table 1

Comparison of baseline maternal characteristics between the two groups

Characteristics Hypotension (n=130) Non-hypotension (n=225) t2 P value
Maternal age (years) 31.52±6.818 30.84±7.020 −0.898 0.37
Amnio fluid contamination 17 (13.1) 29 (23.2) 0.003 0.96
Abnormal amniotic fluid volume 7 (5.4) 16 (7.1) 0.405 0.52
PROM 38 (29.2) 76 (33.8) 0.781 0.38
Intrauterine distress 14 (10.8) 36 (16.0) 1.863 0.17
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy 21 (16.1) 34 (15.1) 0.068 0.79
GDM 25 (19.2) 74 (32.9) 7.643 0.006
Hypothyroidism 4 (3.1) 11 (4.9) 0.668 0.41
hyperthyroidism 6 (4.6) 10 (4.4) 0.006 0.94
Placenta previa 8 (6.2) 12 (5.3) 0.104 0.75
Placental abruption 9 (6.9) 11 (4.9) 0.641 0.42
Chorioamnionitis 13 (10.0) 16 (7.1) 0.917 0.34
Anemia during pregnancy 41 (31.5) 65 (28.9) 0.276 0.60
Prenatal infections 17 (13.1) 15 (6.7) 4.128 0.04
Antenatal steroid therapy 91 (70.0) 133 (59.1) 4.196 0.047

Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; PROM, premature rupture of membranes; SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Comparison of baseline neonatal characteristics between the two groups

Characteristics Hypotension (n=130) Non-hypotension (n=225) Z/t2 value P value
GA, weeks 29.07 (27.71, 30.57) 30.00 (28.57, 31.14) 4.250 <0.001
   <28 37 (28.5)* 30 (13.3) 12.316 <0.001
   28–32 93 (71.5)* 195 (86.7)
BW, g 1181.75±262.412 1255.32±288.728 2.452 0.02
   <1,000 37 (28.5)* 41 (18.2) 6.305 0.043
   1,000–1,500 75 (57.7) 137 (60.9)
   >1,500 18 (13.8) 47 (20.9)
Gender
   Male 67 (51.5) 126 (56.0) 0.661 0.42
   Female 63 (48.5) 99 (44.0)
1 min Apgar score 8.16±1.656 8.21±1.646 0.261 0.80
5 min Apgar score 9.24±0.987 9.41±0.946 1.651 0.10
Multiple birth 45 (34.6) 74 (32.9) 0.110 0.74
Cesarean delivery 80 (51.5) 173 (76.9) 9.481 0.002
IVF 36 (27.7) 61 (27.1) 0.014 0.91
SGA 12 (9.2) 33 (14.7) 2.199 0.14
Surfactant use 109 (83.8) 180 (80.0) 0.805 0.37
Feeding patterns
   Exclusive breast feeding 44 (33.8) 85 (37.8) 0.551 0.46
   Formula feeding 61 (46.9) 98 (43.6) 0.378 0.59
Blood routine indexes within 24 h after birth
   WBC count, ×109/L 11.49±4.46 11.08±3.78 −0.919 0.36
   HB level, g/L 237.63±76.76 224.28±66.96 −1.753 0.08
   PLT count, ×109/L 159.29±26.06 161.66±23.68 0.874 0.38

Data are presented as median (IQR), mean ± SD or n (%). *, compared with the non-hypotension group, P<0.05. BW, birth weight; GA, gestational age; HB, hemoglobin; IQR, interquartile range; IVF, in vitro fertilization; PLT, platelet; SD, standard deviation; SGA, small for gestational age; WBC, white blood cell.

Comparison of neonatal morbidity/mortality between the two groups

As shown in Table 3, significantly higher incidences of hsPDA, NEC, surgically treated NEC, and mortality were observed in the hypotensive group (all P<0.05). Conversely, the frequencies of other complications showed no significant intergroup differences (all P>0.05).

Table 3

Comparison of neonatal morbidity and mortality between the two groups

Morbidity/mortality Hypotension (n=130) Non-hypotension (n=225) t2 P value
Invasive ventilation 81 (62.3) 136 (60.4) 0.120 0.73
RDS 95 (73.1) 172 (76.4) 0.501 0.48
Sepsis 10 (7.7) 19 (8.4) 0.062 0.80
Severe IVH 9 (6.9) 15 (6.7) 2.955 0.09
PVL 10 (7.7) 18 (8.0) 0.011 0.92
hsPDA 31 (23.8) 34 (15.1) 3.538 0.04
NEC 24 (18.5) 11 (4.9) 17.079 <0.001
Surgical NEC 11 (8.5) 6 (5.5) 6.068 0.01
BPD 43 (33.1) 68 (30.2) 0.312 0.58
Moderate to severe BPD 29 (22.3) 43 (19.1) 0.521 0.47
ROP 49 (37.7) 89 (40.4) 0.120 0.73
Severe ROP 10 (7.7) 27 (12.0) 1.638 0.20
pulmonary hemorrhage 10 (7.7) 11 (4.9) 1.163 0.28
Death 11 (8.5) 7 (3.1) 4.900 0.03

Data are presented as n (%). BPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia; hsPDA, hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; PVL, periventricular leukomalacia; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; ROP, retinopathy of prematurity.

Correlation analysis between hypotension and neonatal morbidity/mortality

Table 4 illustrates the outcomes of multivariate logistic regression analyses, with early hypotension serving as the independent variable to assess associations with neonatal morbidities and mortality. Results indicated that infants in the hypotension group had a significantly higher incidence of NEC, surgically treated NEC, hsPDA, and death (all P<0.05). Adjusted for potential confounders that were significantly associated with the outcome in univariate analyses (P<0.05), including GA, WB, cesarean delivery, GDM, prenatal infections, and antenatal steroid therapy exposure, the association between neonatal early hypotension and NEC remained statistically significant (OR =2.80, 95% CI: 1.25–6.28, P=0.01).

Table 4

Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the association between early hypotension and neonatal morbidity/mortality

Variable Non-hypotension Hypotension
OR value (95% CI) P value
NEC
   Unadjusted 1.00 4.41 (2.08–9.33) <0.001
   Adjusted 1.00 2.80 (1.25–6.28) 0.01
Surgical NEC
   Unadjusted 1.00 3.37 (1.22–9.35) 0.02
   Adjusted 1.00 1.35 (0.45–4.11) 0.59
hsPDA
   Unadjusted 1.00 1.76 (1.02–3.03) 0.04
   Adjusted 1.00 1.07 (0.49–2.33) 0.87
Death
   Unadjusted 1.00 2.88 (1.09–7.62) 0.03
   Adjusted 1.00 1.52 (0.50–4.55) 0.46

Adjusted for potential confounders identified as significant in the univariate analyses (P<0.05), including GA, BW, cesarean delivery, GDM, prenatal infections, and antenatal steroid therapy exposure. BW, birth weight; CI, confidence interval; GA, gestational age; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus; hsPDA, hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus; NEC, necrotizing enterocolitis; OR, odds ratio.


Discussion

Hypotension frequently occurs in very/extremely preterm infants during the initial postnatal days, particularly within the first 72 hours, and is closely associated with GA and BW (19). Various factors, including immature myocardial function, perinatal asphyxia, early-onset sepsis, hsPDA, and adrenal insufficiency, significantly impact systemic BP regulation in neonates (20-22). Decreased BP often coincides with impaired cardiac output and inadequate systemic perfusion, potentially disrupting the balance between oxygen supply and demand, thereby initiating hypoxic cellular injury, metabolic disturbances, and ultimately multi-organ dysfunction (23,24). Previous studies have linked early neonatal hypotension to severe complications such as BPD, IVH, adverse neurological outcomes, and mortality (25,26). Additionally, hypotension may compromise gastrointestinal perfusion and blood flow, triggering inflammatory responses and ischemic mucosal injury, thereby potentially elevating the risk of NEC (8,27). However, reported associations differ among studies (28).

This investigation revealed notably increased incidences of hsPDA, NEC, surgically treated NEC, and mortality among neonates experiencing hypotension. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusting for confounders such as GA, BW, cesarean delivery rate, GDM, prenatal infections, and exposure to antenatal steroid therapy, confirmed a persistent association between neonatal early hypotension and NEC. These findings align with prior research by Youn et al. (29), which reported significant correlations between NEC and hypotension during the first postnatal week in VLBW infants (OR =2.0, 95% CI: 1.0–3.9). Gephart et al. (7) developed the GutCheckNEC model, integrating multiple clinical risk factors, including neonatal hypotension requiring vasoactive medication, which was independently associated with increased NEC risk (OR =1.51, 95% CI: 1.36–1.69). Additionally, a 14-year retrospective analysis from Korea identified hypotension requiring vasoactive support within the first week of life as a predictor of increased mortality risk. Moreover, surviving infants with medical NEC were also more likely to require surgical intervention, which is consistent with our study findings (30). However, after adjusting for confounders, no statistically significant association was observed between hypotension and either death or surgically treated NEC. These findings suggest that hypotension might contribute to NEC incidence but does not appear to be a critical determinant of disease progression requiring surgery. Collectively, these results suggest that closely monitoring of BP and systemic perfusion in neonates, particularly those with risk factors such as prematurity or low BW, may represent a crucial preventive strategy against NEC.

Definitions of neonatal hypotension differ widely across studies. Although many NICUs commonly define hypotension as MAP lower than the neonate’s GA in weeks, this simplistic criterion overlooks the complex hemodynamic dynamics experienced by preterm infants during early adaptation. In VLBW infants born at <29 weeks GA, median minMAP typically ranges from 1 to 2 mmHg below GA in completed weeks. This discrepancy may result in systematic BP overestimation in clinically stable infants (31). Batton et al. (32) reported that extremely preterm infants are particularly vulnerable to hypotension due to cardiovascular immaturity. Their findings showed that BP typically declines during the first 3 hours after birth, reaches the lowest point at 4–5 hours, and spontaneously improves during the subsequent 24 hours. Moreover, the rate of BP increase between 4 and 24 hours was comparable in untreated infants and those receiving antihypotensive therapy. Additionally, BP in preterm infants tends to increase with greater body mass and age. Clinically stable infants who do not require ventilation typically achieve stabilized BP comparable to term infants at approximately 14 days of life (33). Unfortunately, 16–98% of preterm infants are subjected to cardiovascular interventions in the neonatal period to mitigate associated complications (34). Kharrat et al. (35) emphasized that BP is only one aspect of the intricate hemodynamic state during the early neonatal period, correlating poorly with left ventricular output and organ perfusion, independent of GA or underlying conditions. Consequently, given the limitations of defining hypotension solely by a low MAP, a standardized assessment must also incorporate clinical signs of impaired perfusion resulting from low cardiac output for a more accurate diagnosis. If active management of neonatal early hypotension effectively reduces NEC incidence, our research design could have significant clinical implications.


Conclusions

In conclusion, neonatal early hypotension was found to be associated with an increased risk of NEC. Timely management of circulatory compromise and hypotension may reduce NEC incidence. Nonetheless, the limited sample size and retrospective design necessitate cautious interpretation of our findings.


Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Zibo Yimore Translation CO. LTD for their help in polishing our paper.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the STROBE reporting checklist. Available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2025-416/rc

Data Sharing Statement: Available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2025-416/dss

Peer Review File: Available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2025-416/prf

Funding: This study was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2022YFC2704804) and Innovation Talented Fund of Senior Department of Pediatrics, the Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital (Nos. QZX-04-EKCLJH-16 and QZX-04-EKCLJH-25).

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2025-416/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments. The study protocol received approval from the Seventh Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital ethics committee (No. S2025-032-01), and written informed consent was obtained from all parents/legal guardians upon their infant’s admission to the participating NICU.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Alsaied A, Islam N, Thalib L. Global incidence of Necrotizing Enterocolitis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr 2020;20:344. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Zozaya C, García González I, Avila-Alvarez A, et al. Incidence, Treatment, and Outcome Trends of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants: A Multicenter Cohort Study. Front Pediatr 2020;8:188. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Duchon J, Barbian ME, Denning PW. Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Clin Perinatol 2021;48:229-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Lu J, Martin CR, Claud EC. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants who develop necrotizing enterocolitis: The gut-brain axis. Semin Perinatol 2023;47:151694. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. Cai X, Golubkova A, Hunter CJ. Advances in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. BMC Pediatr 2022;22:225. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Choi YY. Necrotizing enterocolitis in newborns: update in pathophysiology and newly emerging therapeutic strategies. Korean J Pediatr 2014;57:505-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Gephart SM, Spitzer AR, Effken JA, et al. Discrimination of GutCheck(NEC): a clinical risk index for necrotizing enterocolitis. J Perinatol 2014;34:468-75. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Kim SH, Son J, Park HK. Surgical necrotizing enterocolitis risk factors in extremely preterm infants: a Korean nationwide cohort study. Pediatr Res 2025;97:1575-81. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Ohns MJ. Necrotizing Enterocolitis in a Term Newborn: A Case Report. J Pediatr Health Care 2022;36:598-602. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Shah S, Kaul A, Khandare J, et al. Comparison of Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Monitoring vs. Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring in Preterm Infants < 37 Weeks in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit- A Prospective Observational Study. J Trop Pediatr 2021;67:fmab109. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Sweet DG, Carnielli VP, Greisen G, et al. European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update. Neonatology 2023;120:3-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Nuthakki S, Ahmad K, Johnson G, et al. Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: Ongoing Challenges from Definitions to Clinical Care. J Clin Med 2023;12:3864. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Adane T, Worku M, Tigabu A, et al. Hematological Abnormalities in Culture Positive Neonatal Sepsis. Pediatric Health Med Ther 2022;13:217-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Wu JJ, Niduvaje K, Lee LY, et al. Retrospective comparison of death or neurodevelopmental outcomes in extremely low birth weight preterm infants following different management options of haemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus. BMC Pediatr 2021;21:457. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Siffel C, Kistler KD, Sarda SP. Global incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage among extremely preterm infants: a systematic literature review. J Perinat Med 2021;49:1017-26. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Hu X, Liang H, Li F, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: current understanding of the prevention and management. Pediatr Surg Int 2024;40:32. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Golubkova A, Hunter CJ. Updates and recommendations on the surgical management of NEC. Semin Perinatol 2023;47:151698. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. Wilkinson AR, Adams GGW, Fleck BW, et al. UK screening and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity Updated 2022 Guidelines. Early Hum Dev 2023;177-178:105715. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Dempsey EM. What Should We Do about Low Blood Pressure in Preterm Infants. Neonatology 2017;111:402-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Wu TW, Noori S. Recognition and management of neonatal hemodynamic compromise. Pediatr Neonatol 2021;62:S22-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Aldana-Aguirre JC, Deshpande P, Jain A, et al. Physiology of Low Blood Pressure During the First Day After Birth Among Extremely Preterm Neonates. J Pediatr 2021;236:40-46.e3. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Dionne JM. Determinants of Blood Pressure in Neonates and Infants: Predictable Variability. Hypertension 2021;77:781-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Shead SL. Pathophysiology of the Cardiovascular System and Neonatal Hypotension. Neonatal Netw 2015;34:31-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Singh Y, Katheria AC, Vora F. Advances in Diagnosis and Management of Hemodynamic Instability in Neonatal Shock. Front Pediatr 2018;6:2. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Gogcu S, Washburn L, O'Shea TM. Treatment for hypotension in the first 24 postnatal hours and the risk of hearing loss among extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 2020;40:774-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Song YH, Lee JA, Choi BM, et al. Risk factors and prognosis in very low birth weight infants treated for hypotension during the first postnatal week from the Korean Neonatal Network. PLoS One 2021;16:e0258328. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Barrington K, El-Khuffash A, Dempsey E. Intervention and Outcome for Neonatal Hypotension. Clin Perinatol 2020;47:563-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Haefeli S, Kordasz M, Tsai C, et al. Risk Factors for Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Infants With Patent Arterial Duct. A Retrospective Matched Paired Analysis. Front Pediatr 2020;8:179. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Youn YA, Kim EK, Kim SY. Necrotizing Enterocolitis among Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants in Korea. J Korean Med Sci 2015;30:S75-80. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. Choi EK, Kim HJ, Je BK, et al. Morbidity and Mortality Trends in Preterm Infants of <32 Weeks Gestational Age with Severe Intraventricular Hemorrhage : A 14-Year Single-Center Retrospective Study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2023;66:316-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  31. Faust K, Härtel C, Preuß M, et al. Short-term outcome of very-low-birthweight infants with arterial hypotension in the first 24 h of life. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015;100:F388-92. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  32. Batton B, Li L, Newman NS, et al. Evolving blood pressure dynamics for extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol 2014;34:301-5. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  33. Kent AL, Meskell S, Falk MC, et al. Normative blood pressure data in non-ventilated premature neonates from 28-36 weeks gestation. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:141-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  34. Barrington KJ. Hypotension and shock in the preterm infant. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2008;13:16-23. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  35. Kharrat A, Rios DI, Weisz DE, et al. The Relationship between blood pressure parameters and left ventricular output in neonates. J Perinatol 2019;39:619-25. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Tang L, Wang F, Ye Z, Zhang W, Wu F, Chen Y, Kong X. Increased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very/extremely preterm infants with early hypotension: a retrospective cohort study. Transl Pediatr 2025;14(10):2677-2685. doi: 10.21037/tp-2025-416

Download Citation