Gut and respiratory microbiomes in asthma and allergic diseases: a narrative review of mechanistic insights, gut-lung axis interactions and therapeutic opportunities
Review Article

Gut and respiratory microbiomes in asthma and allergic diseases: a narrative review of mechanistic insights, gut-lung axis interactions and therapeutic opportunities

Liqin Ke, Shuxian Li, Guohong Zhu ORCID logo

Department of Respiratory, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents’ Health and Diseases, Hangzhou, China

Contributions: (I) Conception and design: All authors; (II) Administrative support: G Zhu; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: L Ke, S Li; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: All authors; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors.

Correspondence to: Guohong Zhu, PhD. Chief Physician, Department of Respiratory, Children’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Children and Adolescents’ Health and Diseases, 3333, Binsheng Road, Hangzhou 310052, China. Email: 6193010@zju.edu.cn.

Background and Objective: Asthma and allergic diseases are increasingly prevalent chronic inflammatory disorders characterized by immune dysregulation, epithelial barrier impairment, and marked clinical heterogeneity. Increasing evidence suggests that both the gut microbiome and the respiratory microbiome are associated with disease initiation, phenotype expression, and exacerbation risk. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence on microbiome alterations associated with asthma and allergic diseases, with particular emphasis on mechanistic pathways, bidirectional gut-lung axis interactions, and microbiome-targeted therapeutic opportunities.

Methods: We conducted a narrative review of recent English-language literature on the gut microbiome, respiratory microbiome, asthma, allergic diseases, microbial metabolites, and microbiome-based interventions. Relevant studies and reviews were identified through literature screening and were selected for their relevance to early-life microbial colonization, disease-associated dysbiosis, immune regulation, gut-lung axis biology, and translational strategies.

Key Content and Findings: Current evidence indicates that early-life gut microbial colonization, airway microbial dysbiosis, and altered metabolite production are associated with allergic susceptibility, inflammatory phenotype, exacerbation risk, and disease progression. The strength of evidence differs across domains: human cohort and clinical studies most strongly support associations between early-life microbial patterns, airway dysbiosis, and disease phenotypes, whereas many mechanistic pathways remain supported primarily by preclinical or experimental data. Key mechanisms include mucosal microbiome-immune crosstalk, local airway epithelial-microbial interactions, short-chain fatty acid-mediated immune regulation, tryptophan and bile acid signaling, epithelial barrier dysfunction, viral-microbiome interactions, and epigenetic modulation. The gut-lung axis provides a bidirectional framework linking intestinal and airway microbial ecosystems through immune, metabolic, inflammatory, infectious, and treatment-related pathways. Emerging interventions show different levels of evidence and should not be interpreted as equally mature therapeutic strategies.

Conclusions: The gut and respiratory microbiomes are important components of the pathogenic network underlying asthma and allergic diseases and may represent future targets for prevention and therapy. However, many reported microbial signatures remain associative, and stronger standardization, longitudinal validation, functional studies, and evidence-stratified clinical trials are needed before microbiome-informed precision medicine can be broadly implemented in routine care.

Keywords: Asthma; allergic diseases; gut microbiome; respiratory microbiome; gut-lung axis


Submitted Apr 12, 2026. Accepted for publication May 28, 2026. Published online Jun 17, 2026.

doi: 10.21037/tp-2026-0360


Introduction

Background

Asthma and allergic diseases are among the most prevalent chronic inflammatory disorders worldwide and represent a growing public health burden across both pediatric and adult populations. Their incidence has risen substantially over recent decades, especially in industrialized and urbanized regions, indicating that environmental and lifestyle-related factors contribute importantly to disease susceptibility beyond genetic predisposition (1-3). Asthma is characterized by chronic airway inflammation, airway hyperresponsiveness, and variable airflow limitation, whereas allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, and food allergy are marked by immune dysregulation, epithelial barrier dysfunction, and exaggerated responses to otherwise harmless antigens (1,2). Although these conditions affect different target organs, they share common immunopathological features, including type 2 inflammation, impaired immune tolerance, and persistent mucosal barrier abnormalities.

Traditional models of asthma and allergy pathogenesis have focused on gene-environment interactions, allergen exposure, respiratory infections, pollution, and host immune immaturity. The hygiene hypothesis and related concepts propose that reduced microbial exposure during early life may impair immune education and favor allergic sensitization (1,3,4). Within this framework, the human microbiome has emerged as a critical mediator linking environmental exposures to immune development and disease risk.

The gut microbiome and respiratory microbiome are now recognized as two major microbial ecosystems involved in host homeostasis and immune regulation (3,5,6). Disruption of these ecological networks, commonly described as dysbiosis, has been associated with asthma susceptibility, allergic sensitization, disease severity, and exacerbation risk (1,3,6). Microbial metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids, tryptophan-derived metabolites, and bile acid derivatives, can influence epithelial integrity, dendritic cell activity, T-cell differentiation, and inflammatory signaling pathways (7-11). At the same time, growing evidence supports the concept of a bidirectional gut-lung axis, whereby gut-derived microbial products and immune signals may affect distal respiratory immunity, while airway inflammation, respiratory infection, medication exposure, and systemic immune activation may also feed back on intestinal microbial ecology (12-16).

Knowledge gap

Despite the rapid expansion of microbiome research in asthma and allergic diseases, several important limitations remain. Many studies have examined the gut microbiome and respiratory microbiome separately, resulting in a fragmented understanding of their relative and combined contributions to disease pathogenesis (3,5,6). Much of the existing literature remains associative rather than mechanistic, and microbial signatures identified in human cohorts do not necessarily establish causality (3,5,6,10,17). Conversely, many detailed mechanistic insights come from animal or in vitro models and require cautious translation to human disease. In addition, the biological components of the gut-lung axis are still not fully resolved (12-15,18). Clinical translation remains limited because results from probiotics, prebiotics, dietary interventions, and fecal microbiota transplantation have been inconsistent and are complicated by methodological heterogeneity (19-33).

Objective and scope of this review

This review provides a comprehensive and mechanistically oriented overview of the roles of the gut and respiratory microbiomes in the pathogenesis and progression of asthma and allergic diseases. It summarizes microbiome alterations associated with disease (3-5,34,35), examines how microbial communities influence allergic inflammation (7-13,36), discusses the gut-lung axis as an integrative framework (12-16), and evaluates current and emerging microbiome-targeted strategies (15,19-25,28,37,38). We present this article in accordance with the Narrative Review reporting checklist (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2026-0360/rc).


Methods

This article was designed as a narrative review rather than a systematic review or meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for English-language literature published from January 2010 to February 2026 using combinations of terms related to asthma, allergic diseases, gut microbiome, respiratory microbiome, gut-lung axis. Reference lists of relevant reviews and key mechanistic articles were also screened. Studies were selected for relevance to microbiome alterations, mechanistic plausibility, gut-lung axis biology, and translational strategies. Because the aim was interpretive synthesis rather than quantitative evidence pooling, formal risk-of-bias scoring, meta-analysis, and PRISMA-style study selection were not performed. Table 1 summarizes the narrative literature search and selection approach.

Table 1

The search strategy summary

Item Specification
Date of search February 15, 2026
Database searched PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and reference lists of relevant reviews and key mechanistic articles
Search terms used Asthma; allergic diseases; gut microbiome; respiratory microbiome; gut-lung axis
Timeframe January 1, 2010–February 1, 2026
Inclusion and exclusion criteria Inclusion criteria: studies involving the gut/respiratory microbiome in asthma and allergic diseases, the biology of the gut-lung axis, or intervention measures targeting the microbiome, including population cohort studies, clinical trials, mechanistic animal or in vitro experiments, and systematic reviews
Exclusion criteria: studies unrelated to the microbiome in asthma and allergic diseases; abstracts lacking sufficient methodological details; duplicate reports; and articles for which full text is unavailable
Selection approach Articles were selected for relevance to disease-associated microbiome alterations, mechanistic plausibility, gut-lung axis biology, and microbiome-targeted prevention or therapy. Human studies were prioritized for clinical associations; animal and in vitro studies were used to clarify mechanisms
Evidence interpretation Findings were synthesized narratively and interpreted according to evidence type: human associative data, longitudinal human data, preclinical mechanistic data, clinical trial evidence, or conceptual/translational evidence
Selection process The search outcomes were meticulously scrutinized by two distinct authors (L.K., and S.L.), adhering strictly to the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. In instances in which discrepancies arose, a third reviewer (G.Z.) was involved to provide an impartial decision. All authors approved the final list of references

Microbiome alterations associated with asthma and allergic diseases

Early-life gut microbiome colonization and allergic susceptibility

Early life represents a critical developmental window during which gut microbial development appears to shape immune maturation and later allergic susceptibility. Human birth-cohort studies consistently associate delivery mode, feeding practices, maternal microbial transfer, antibiotic exposure, infection history, and environmental microbial diversity with infant gut microbial composition and later asthma or allergy risk (3,4,34,39). However, these data are largely associative and may be confounded by host genetics, antibiotic indication, diet, environment, and socioeconomic factors. Mechanistic support comes mainly from experimental studies showing that disrupted microbial succession can alter dendritic cell maturation, regulatory T-cell induction, Th2-skewed immunity, and microbial metabolite production (1,7,8,36). Thus, early-life dysbiosis should be interpreted as a marker and potential contributor to immune deviation rather than as a single deterministic cause of allergic disease, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

Representative gut microbiome alterations associated with asthma and allergic diseases

Life stage/context Key microbial alterations Reported association with disease Potential mechanistic relevance References
Vaginal delivery Enrichment of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Bacteroides Linked to healthier immune maturation and lower allergic susceptibility Supports early immune education and tolerance (3,4,34)
Cesarean delivery Delayed colonization by beneficial anaerobes Associated with higher wheeze and childhood asthma risk in some cohorts Alters early microbial exposure during a critical developmental window (3,4,34)
Breastfeeding Enrichment of bifidobacteria and milk oligosaccharide-utilizing taxa Associated with more favorable immune development Supports epithelial integrity and immunoregulatory metabolites (4,23,34)
Early antibiotic exposure Reduced diversity and depletion of SCFA-producing bacteria Associated with increased wheezing, asthma, and allergic disease Disrupts microbial succession and Treg-related regulation (3,4,7,40)
Reduced diversity in infancy Lower richness and instability of gut communities Associated with later asthma and allergic sensitization May impair immune tolerance and promote Th2-skewed responses (3,4,39)
Expansion of proteobacteria Relative enrichment of potentially pro-inflammatory taxa Marks an unfavorable developmental trajectory May enhance innate immune activation and inflammatory signaling (4,36,41)

SCFA, short-chain fatty acids.

Respiratory microbiome dysbiosis and disease phenotypes

The respiratory microbiome is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of airway immune homeostasis and asthma-related disease expression. Human airway studies show that asthma and allergic airway disease are often associated with reduced microbial diversity and enrichment of potentially pathogenic genera such as Haemophilus, Moraxella, Streptococcus, and Neisseria (5,6,17). Unlike the gut microbiome, which is often linked to systemic immune education and metabolite-mediated signaling, the respiratory microbiome is positioned at the site of airway inflammation and may be more directly related to local epithelial activation, neutrophilic inflammation, infection susceptibility, and exacerbation tendency (17,35,42,43). Nevertheless, whether airway dysbiosis initiates disease, reflects inflamed airway ecology, or both, remains context dependent.

Shared and site-specific microbial signatures in asthma and allergic diseases

A useful framework is to distinguish shared dysbiosis features from site-specific functions. Both gut and respiratory microbiomes may show reduced diversity, loss of beneficial commensals, and enrichment of taxa associated with inflammation or impaired barrier function (3,5,6). The gut microbiome is most strongly linked to early immune education, systemic tolerance, metabolic outputs, and circulating immunomodulatory molecules, whereas the respiratory microbiome is more closely linked to local airway ecology, inflammatory phenotype, infection-exacerbation dynamics, and airway remodeling (3,5,11,17). This distinction helps separate systemic developmental effects from local airway effects and provides a clearer basis for interpreting gut-lung axis interactions, as shown in Table 3.

Table 3

Respiratory microbiome characteristics across asthma and allergic disease phenotypes

Disease phenotype/context Airway microbial features Immune or inflammatory characteristics Clinical relevance References
Healthy airway state Balanced communities dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria Maintains local immune homeostasis Reference state for diseased airways (5,6)
Early-life airway dysbiosis Enrichment of Moraxella, Streptococcus, or Staphylococcus May favor early mucosal inflammation Associated with recurrent wheeze and later asthma risk (35)
General asthma Reduced diversity with enrichment of Haemophilus, Moraxella, Streptococcus, or Neisseria Associated with chronic airway inflammation Linked to disease presence and severity (5,6,17)
Neutrophilic asthma Greater enrichment of pro-inflammatory taxa Associated with neutrophilic inflammation and non-type 2 activation Often linked to more severe disease and poorer lung function (17,42)
Acute exacerbation Shift toward unstable or pathogen-dominant communities Increased inflammatory activation Associated with worsening symptoms and higher exacerbation burden (43-45)

Microbiome-immune crosstalk in gut and airway mucosa

The microbiome influences allergic disease through overlapping immune pathways in the gut and airways. In human studies, altered gut and airway microbial patterns are associated with allergic sensitization, asthma phenotype, and disease severity, but these associations do not by themselves prove causality (3,5,6,17). Mechanistic evidence, mainly from animal and cellular studies, suggests that commensal microorganisms can shape dendritic cell maturation, promote regulatory T-cell development, influence T helper cell type 1/T helper cell type 2 (Th1/Th2) balance, and modulate epithelial cytokine signaling (7,11,36). In the airways, the respiratory microbiome is not simply a downstream marker of gut dysbiosis; it may directly interact with epithelial cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and pattern-recognition receptors to influence local cytokine release, mucus production, antimicrobial defense, and eosinophilic or neutrophilic inflammation (6,17,46). Thus, microbiome-immune crosstalk should be interpreted as a set of local and systemic mechanisms supported by different levels of evidence across experimental and human settings.

Microbial metabolites and downstream immune regulation

Short-chain fatty acids and regulatory immune responses

Among microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids are the most extensively studied in relation to asthma and allergic diseases. Human observational studies link reduced SCFA-producing taxa or altered metabolite profiles with asthma risk and disease severity, whereas experimental studies provide stronger mechanistic support for acetate, propionate, and butyrate in promoting regulatory T-cell development, supporting epithelial integrity, and suppressing excessive inflammatory signaling (7,8,13). SCFAs may influence the lung both indirectly through systemic immune regulation and directly through effects on airway epithelial and immune-cell responses after entering the circulation. However, the degree to which circulating SCFAs determine clinical asthma phenotypes in humans remains incompletely established (7,10,13).

Tryptophan metabolites, bile acids, and other signaling mediators

Tryptophan metabolites and bile-acid derivatives illustrate a broader principle: microbiome function may be more informative than taxonomy alone. Microbial tryptophan metabolites can activate the aryl hydrocarbon receptor and influence mucosal immune homeostasis, while microbially modified bile acids interact with host receptors such as farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and Takeda G protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5) to modulate inflammatory and metabolic regulation (7,9,11). These pathways are mechanistically plausible, but direct human evidence linking specific metabolite changes to asthma onset, phenotype stability, or treatment response remains emerging.

Epithelial barrier dysfunction, inflammatory signaling, and epigenetic regulation

Epithelial barrier dysfunction is a central feature linking microbiome disturbance to asthma and allergic diseases. Human studies support the coexistence of barrier impairment, dysbiosis, and allergic inflammation, while experimental models suggest that dysbiosis may weaken tight junction integrity, increase permeability, and facilitate abnormal exposure to allergens and pathogens (2,6,36). In the respiratory tract, airway dysbiosis may further amplify epithelial alarmin release, mucus hypersecretion, impaired antimicrobial defense, and susceptibility to viral infection. Viral infections such as respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus can in turn alter airway microbial communities and intensify inflammatory signaling, creating a local feedback loop between the respiratory microbiome and airway inflammation (44,45,47-50). In parallel, microbial metabolites such as SCFAs can affect histone deacetylase activity and other epigenetic pathways, thereby exerting longer-term effects on immune programming (7,8,51). These mechanisms are best viewed as interacting pathways rather than isolated linear causal chains, as shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Major mechanistic pathways linking microbiome dysbiosis to allergic inflammation

Mechanistic pathway Key cells/mediators Biological effects Evidence interpretation References
Gut immune education Dendritic cells, Treg cells, Th1/Th2 balance, IL-10, TGF-beta Shapes immune tolerance and allergic sensitization risk Supported by human associations and stronger preclinical mechanistic data (7,8,11,36)
Local airway microbiome-epithelium interaction Airway epithelial cells, macrophages, neutrophils, pattern-recognition receptors Modulates epithelial cytokines, antimicrobial defense, mucus production, and local inflammatory tone Human airway studies support phenotype associations; causal direction remains context dependent (5,6,17,46)
Type 2 and non-type 2 inflammatory skewing Th2 cells, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, neutrophil-associated pathways Contributes to eosinophilic or neutrophilic airway inflammation Mechanistically plausible; phenotype-specific human validation remains incomplete (1,12,17,36)
SCFA-mediated systemic signaling Acetate, propionate, butyrate, GPR41/43, HDAC pathways Promotes regulatory responses and may influence distal airway immunity Strong preclinical support; human clinical causality remains less established (7,8,13)
Barrier dysfunction Tight junction proteins, mucus layer, epithelial cytokines Increases permeability, allergen exposure, and epithelial alarmin signaling Supported across allergic disease biology; microbiome-specific directionality requires caution (2,6,36)
Viral-microbiome feedback RSV, rhinovirus, airway microbiota, antiviral immunity Links infection, dysbiosis, exacerbation risk, and airway remodeling Important for respiratory microbiome contribution to disease instability (44,45,47-50)

IL-10, interleukin-10; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus; SCFA, short-chain fatty acids; TGF, transforming growth factor; Th1/Th2, T helper cell type 1/T helper cell type 2.


The gut-lung axis in disease initiation and progression

Biological basis of the gut-lung axis

The gut-lung axis refers to the bidirectional biological communication between the intestinal microbiome and the respiratory system (12-16). The gut and lung are connected through systemic immune pathways, circulating microbial metabolites, and shared inflammatory networks. This framework helps explain how microbial events in the gut can influence airway immunity and how respiratory inflammation may affect intestinal microbial homeostasis, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Schematic overview of the gut-lung axis in asthma and allergic diseases. The gut-lung axis is bidirectional. Gut dysbiosis may influence the respiratory system through immune-cell trafficking, systemic immune education, and circulating microbial metabolites. Conversely, airway dysbiosis, respiratory infection, airway inflammation, hypoxia, corticosteroid or antibiotic exposure, and systemic inflammatory responses may feed back on intestinal microbial composition and barrier function. These reciprocal pathways contribute to allergic inflammation, viral susceptibility, exacerbations, and airway remodeling.

Immune cell trafficking and systemic immune education

One direction of the gut-lung axis involves intestinal immune education and immune-cell trafficking to distant mucosal sites. Immune cells conditioned in the intestinal mucosa may later migrate to the lungs, shaping the balance between tolerance and inflammation (12,14,18,36). Gut dysbiosis may therefore alter distal airway immune responses by modifying mucosal priming, systemic immune-cell development, and circulating metabolite exposure.

Circulating microbial metabolites and distal organ effects

The reverse direction of the gut-lung axis is equally important. Airway dysbiosis, respiratory viral infection, chronic airway inflammation, and asthma therapies may influence systemic immune tone, swallowing of airway secretions, intestinal permeability, and antimicrobial or corticosteroid exposure, all of which can reshape intestinal microbial ecology (12-16,44,45,47-50). This bidirectional model avoids treating asthma as a simple consequence of gut dysbiosis and better reflects the contribution of the respiratory microbiome highlighted in the title of this review.

Contribution of the gut-lung axis to asthma progression

Airway inflammation and immune imbalance

The gut-lung axis is increasingly recognized as an important contributor to asthma progression because it integrates systemic immune programming with local airway inflammation. Gut dysbiosis may reduce immunoregulatory metabolites and alter immune priming, whereas airway dysbiosis may directly shape epithelial activation, mucus production, neutrophilic or eosinophilic inflammation, and infection susceptibility (7,8,12,13,15-17,36,42). These reciprocal effects may influence disease onset, severity, persistence, and inflammatory phenotype.

Viral interactions, exacerbations, and airway remodeling

Respiratory viral infections, acute exacerbations, and airway remodeling further illustrate why the axis should be considered bidirectional. Viral infections such as respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus are major triggers of asthma attacks, and airway microbial shifts may impair antiviral immunity or amplify inflammation (44,45,47-50). At the same time, systemic inflammation and treatment exposures during exacerbations may perturb gut microbial communities. Persistent microbiome-related immune dysregulation may contribute to epithelial injury, mucus hypersecretion, and structural airway changes (12,52,53).


Microbiome-targeted prevention and therapeutic strategies

Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics

Preventive use in early life

Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics have attracted substantial interest as early-life strategies to reduce allergic disease risk by modulating microbial colonization during a critical window of immune development (19-24). The most consistent clinical signal is for eczema prevention, whereas evidence for asthma prevention remains weaker and more inconsistent (19,20,23). These differences likely reflect strain specificity, timing, baseline microbiome composition, host diet, and heterogeneity in outcome definitions.

Therapeutic use in established disease

For established disease, probiotics and related interventions should be viewed as adjunctive and evidence-limited rather than established asthma therapies. Some studies suggest improvement in allergic rhinitis symptoms, but asthma outcomes remain mixed and depend on strain selection, treatment duration, age, phenotype, and concomitant therapy (21-26). Current evidence does not support treating all probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic strategies as equivalent.

Dietary modulation and metabolite-oriented interventions

Dietary modulation has a stronger biological rationale than many intensive microbiome interventions because diet can influence microbial substrate availability and metabolite production. High-fiber diets and microbiome-supportive dietary patterns may enhance SCFA production, strengthen epithelial barrier function, and reduce inflammatory signaling (54-57). However, clinical responses vary across individuals and likely depend on baseline microbiome composition, dietary adherence, host metabolism, and disease phenotype (58,59). Dietary strategies are therefore promising but still require better phenotype-specific evidence.

Fecal microbiota transplantation and emerging microbiome-based therapies

Fecal microbiota transplantation and next-generation microbiome therapies should be separated from probiotics and diet because their evidence base is much less mature for asthma and allergic diseases. Fecal microbiota transplantation has shown promise mainly in preclinical allergic airway inflammation models, but clinical evidence remains limited and important concerns persist regarding donor selection, safety, reproducibility, durability, and regulatory oversight (15,28,37,38). Emerging next-generation probiotics, targeted microbial consortia, metabolite-based therapies, and precision microbiome approaches remain largely conceptual or early translational strategies that require validated biomarkers and prospective clinical testing (15,28,60).

Current limitations in clinical translation

Translation into routine clinical practice remains limited because the evidence base is uneven across intervention types. Preventive probiotic strategies have some clinical signal, particularly for eczema; asthma prevention and treatment results remain inconsistent; dietary approaches are biologically plausible but heterogeneous; fecal microbiota transplantation remains mainly preclinical; and precision microbiome-based therapy is still an emerging concept (19-33,58,60,61). Future trials should stratify patients by baseline microbiome composition, disease phenotype, age, diet, medication exposure, and functional microbial readouts, as shown in Table 5 and Figure 2.

Table 5

Microbiome-targeted interventions for asthma and allergic diseases

Intervention Proposed mechanism Evidence status Interpretation Main limitations References
Probiotics Restore selected beneficial microbes and modulate immune balance Clinical studies and meta-analyses, plus mechanistic studies Some clinical signal for eczema/allergic rhinitis; asthma prevention or treatment remains inconsistent Strain heterogeneity, timing, dose, host factors, and mixed clinical outcomes (19-26)
Prebiotics/synbiotics Promote beneficial taxa and metabolite production Clinical and nutritional studies Biologically plausible support for immune development; clinical effect size remains uncertain Limited high-quality long-term evidence and variable formulations (23,24)
Dietary fiber intervention Increase SCFA-producing bacteria and anti-inflammatory metabolites Nutritional, human observational, and mechanistic studies Promising and practical, but likely dependent on baseline microbiome and phenotype Individual response variability and difficulty standardizing diet exposure (54,55,57-59)
Fecal microbiota transplantation Broad reconstruction of microbial diversity and function Mainly preclinical evidence for asthma/allergic disease Conceptually promising but not ready for routine asthma or allergy management Safety, donor screening, reproducibility, durability, and regulatory concerns (15,28,37,38)
Precision microbiome-based intervention Tailor therapy according to baseline microbiome, host factors, and functional readouts Emerging conceptual and early translational evidence Potential for stratification and response prediction, but clinical utility is unproven Requires robust biomarkers, validated algorithms, and prospective trials (58,60,62,63)

SCFA, short-chain fatty acids.

Figure 2 Microbiome-mediated mechanisms and therapeutic targets in asthma and allergic diseases. Microbiome dysbiosis, barrier dysfunction, and altered metabolite production promote immune imbalance and persistent inflammation. These mechanisms create multiple intervention points, including probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, dietary modulation, fecal microbiota transplantation, and precision microbiome-based therapies. LPS, lipopolysaccharide; SCFA, short-chain fatty acids.

Conclusions

Accumulating evidence indicates that the gut and respiratory microbiomes are associated with asthma and allergic diseases through effects on immune maturation, epithelial barrier integrity, inflammatory signaling, microbial metabolite production, infection susceptibility, and airway ecological stability (1,3,5,7,11). The current evidence base should be interpreted in layers: human studies support important associations between microbial patterns and disease phenotypes; longitudinal studies provide stronger temporal clues; and preclinical studies offer mechanistic plausibility. The gut microbiome appears especially relevant to immune education, systemic tolerance, and metabolite-mediated signaling, whereas the respiratory microbiome is more closely linked to local airway inflammation, infection susceptibility, exacerbation patterns, and inflammatory phenotype (3,5,11,17). The gut-lung axis is therefore best understood as a bidirectional framework integrating systemic and local microbial-immune interactions rather than as a one-way pathway from intestinal dysbiosis to asthma. Future research should focus on integrating taxonomic, functional, immunological, and clinical data, improving methodological standardization, and refining patient stratification so that microbiome-informed precision medicine can become a realistic clinical goal (29-33,60).


Acknowledgments

None.


Footnote

Reporting Checklist: The authors have completed the Narrative Review reporting checklist. Available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2026-0360/rc

Peer Review File: Available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2026-0360/prf

Funding: None.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-2026-0360/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Augustine T, Kumar M, Al Khodor S, et al. Microbial Dysbiosis Tunes the Immune Response Towards Allergic Disease Outcomes. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2023;65:43-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  2. Berni Canani R, Caminati M, Carucci L, et al. Skin, gut, and lung barrier: Physiological interface and target of intervention for preventing and treating allergic diseases. Allergy 2024;79:1485-500. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  3. Smulders T, Van Der Schee MP, Maitland-Van Der Zee AH, et al. Influence of the gut and airway microbiome on asthma development and disease. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2024;35:e14095. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  4. Boulund U, Thorsen J, Trivedi U, et al. The role of the early-life gut microbiome in childhood asthma. Gut Microbes 2025;17:2457489. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  5. van Beveren GJ, Said H, van Houten MA, et al. The respiratory microbiome in childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023;152:1352-67. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  6. Galeana-Cadena D, Gómez-García IA, Lopez-Salinas KG, et al. Winds of change a tale of: asthma and microbiome. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1295215. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  7. Lee-Sarwar KA, Lasky-Su J, Kelly RS, et al. Gut Microbial-Derived Metabolomics of Asthma. Metabolites 2020;10:97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  8. Yip W, Hughes MR, Li Y, et al. Butyrate Shapes Immune Cell Fate and Function in Allergic Asthma. Front Immunol 2021;12:628453. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  9. Tomofuji Y, Kishikawa T, Sonehara K, et al. Analysis of gut microbiome, host genetics, and plasma metabolites reveals gut microbiome-host interactions in the Japanese population. Cell Rep 2023;42:113324. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  10. Wang Z, Lai Z, Zhang X, et al. Altered gut microbiome compositions are associated with the severity of asthma. J Thorac Dis 2021;13:4322-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  11. Cobos-Uribe C, Rebuli ME. Understanding the Functional Role of the Microbiome and Metabolome in Asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2023;23:67-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  12. Lv J, Zhang Y, Liu S, et al. Gut-lung axis in allergic asthma: microbiota-driven immune dysregulation and therapeutic strategies. Front Pharmacol 2025;16:1617546. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  13. Verma A, Bhagchandani T, Rai A, et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acid (SCFA) as a Connecting Link between Microbiota and Gut-Lung Axis-A Potential Therapeutic Intervention to Improve Lung Health. ACS Omega 2024;9:14648-71. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  14. Yang Z, Mao W, Wang J, et al. The gut-lung axis in asthma: microbiota-driven mechanisms and therapeutic perspectives. Front Microbiol 2025;16:1680521. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  15. Song XL, Liang J, Lin SZ, et al. Gut-lung axis and asthma: A historical review on mechanism and future perspective. Clin Transl Allergy 2024;14:e12356. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  16. Wang Z, Yu J, Liu Y, et al. Role of the microbiota-gut-lung axis in the pathogenesis of pulmonary disease in children and novel therapeutic strategies. Front Immunol 2025;16:1636876. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  17. Kim YH, Park MR, Kim SY, et al. Respiratory Microbiome Profiles Are Associated With Distinct Inflammatory Phenotype and Lung Function in Children With Asthma. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2024;34:246-56. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  18. He S, Hu X, Gong X, et al. Exploring the role of intelectin-1 in modulating asthma through the gut-bone-lung axis. Gut Microbes 2025;17:2576658. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  19. Wang HZ, Hayles EH, Fiander M, et al. Probiotics in infants for prevention of allergic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2025;6:CD006475. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  20. Sun S, Chang G, Zhang L. The prevention effect of probiotics against eczema in children: an update systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatolog Treat 2022;33:1844-54. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  21. Eslami M, Bahar A, Keikha M, et al. Probiotics function and modulation of the immune system in allergic diseases. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2020;48:771-88. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  22. Huang J, Zhang J, Wang X, et al. Effect of Probiotics on Respiratory Tract Allergic Disease and Gut Microbiota. Front Nutr 2022;9:821900. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  23. Sestito S, D'Auria E, Baldassarre ME, et al. The Role of Prebiotics and Probiotics in Prevention of Allergic Diseases in Infants. Front Pediatr 2020;8:583946. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  24. Bai J, Zhao X, Zhang M, et al. Gut microbiota: A target for prebiotics and probiotics in the intervention and therapy of food allergy. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2024;64:3623-37. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  25. Luo C, Peng S, Li M, et al. The Efficacy and Safety of Probiotics for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol 2022;13:848279. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  26. Chen N, Liu F, Gao Q, et al. A Meta-Analysis of Probiotics for the Treatment of Allergic Airway Diseases in Children and Adolescents. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2022;36:480-90. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  27. Shipton EV, Foxcroft K, Dekker Nitert M, et al. OFFSPRING: A SPRING Follow-Up Study Assessing the Efficacy of Maternal Probiotics and Allergic Disease in the Child. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2024;185:212-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  28. Liang M, Li L, Fan J. Multi-target Effects of Short-Chain Fatty Acids for Obesity-Related Asthma: Interventional Potential and Challenges. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2025;68:97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  29. Zass L, Mwapagha LM, Louis-Jacques AF, et al. Advancing microbiome research through standardized data and metadata collection: introducing the Microbiome Research Data Toolkit. Database (Oxford) 2024;2024:baae062. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  30. Kim JW, Choi EC, Lee KJ. Standardizing the approach to clinical-based human microbiome research: from clinical information collection to microbiome profiling and human resource utilization. Osong Public Health Res Perspect 2025;16:300-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  31. Ferrocino I, Ferrara M, Garello M, et al. Standardizing microbiome research: interlaboratory validation of SOPs for sample preparation and DNA extraction from food and environmental ecosystems. Environ Microbiome 2025;21:14. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  32. Stumptner C, Stadlbauer V, O'Neil D, et al. The Pre-Analytical CEN/TS Standard for Microbiome Diagnostics-How Can Research and Development Benefit? Nutrients 2022;14:1976. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  33. Kim L, Lavrinienko A, Sebechlebska Z, et al. Tier-based standards for FAIR sequence data and metadata sharing in microbiome research. Nucleic Acids Res 2025;53:gkaf777. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  34. Gao Y, Nanan R, Macia L, et al. The maternal gut microbiome during pregnancy and offspring allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;148:669-78. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  35. Tang HHF, Lang A, Teo SM, et al. Developmental patterns in the nasopharyngeal microbiome during infancy are associated with asthma risk. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021;147:1683-91. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  36. Ghosh N, Sinha K. Guardians within: Cross-talk between the gut microbiome and host immune system. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2025;16:111245. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  37. Guo S, Shi Y, Xu A, et al. Liubao tea extract ameliorates ovalbumin-induced allergic asthma by regulating gut microbiota in mice. Food Funct 2023;14:10605-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  38. Liu D, Hu L, Yang Y, et al. Saccharomyces boulardii alleviates allergic asthma by restoring gut microbiota and metabolic homeostasis via up-regulation of METTL3 in an m6A-dependent manner. Immunol Lett 2024;267:106853. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  39. Lee-Sarwar KA, Chen YC, Chen YY, et al. The maternal prenatal and offspring early-life gut microbiome of childhood asthma phenotypes. Allergy 2023;78:418-28. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  40. Sameeha FNU, Riaz S, Aslam MN, et al. Association between early-life antibiotic exposure and gut microbiome alterations linked to allergic diseases in children: a systematic review. Eur J Med Res 2025;31:98. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  41. Zheng P, Zhang K, Lv X, et al. Gut Microbiome and Metabolomics Profiles of Allergic and Non-Allergic Childhood Asthma. J Asthma Allergy 2022;15:419-35. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  42. Dasgupta S. Unraveling the Microbiome-Asthma Axis: Metagenomic Insights from Airway and Gut Microbial Communities. OMICS 2025;29:374-83. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  43. Wang Q, Guo A, Sheng M, et al. The changes of respiratory microbiome between mild and severe asthma patients. Microbiol Immunol 2021;65:204-13. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  44. Zhao X, Hu M, Zhou H, et al. The role of gut microbiome in the complex relationship between respiratory tract infection and asthma. Front Microbiol 2023;14:1219942. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  45. Kloepfer KM, Kennedy JL. Childhood respiratory viral infections and the microbiome. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023;152:827-34. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  46. Li W, Lu K, Tang J, et al. The alterations of airway and intestine microbiota in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol 2025;16:1675124. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  47. Ethridge AD, Yagi K, Martínez LA, et al. RSV infection in neonatal mice and gastrointestinal microbiome alteration contribute to allergic predisposition. Mucosal Immunol 2025;18:874-86. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  48. Zelasko S, Swaney MH, Sandstrom S, et al. Early-life upper airway microbiota are associated with decreased lower respiratory tract infections. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2025;155:436-50. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  49. Yagi K, Ethridge AD, Falkowski NR, et al. Microbiome modifications by steroids during viral exacerbation of asthma and in healthy mice. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2024;327:L646-60. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  50. Gavkare AM, Nanaware NL, Sonar MN, et al. Gut microbiome and viral infections: A hidden nexus for immune protection. World J Virol 2025;14:111912. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  51. Suleiman KY, Akorede GJ, Afisu B, et al. The epigenetic influence of diet-induced gut microbiome changes in precision nutrition - a systematic review. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench 2025;18:270-85. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  52. Tanabe N, Matsumoto H. From mucus plugging to airway dilatation in chronic airway diseases: A perspective on the contribution of the airway microbiome and inflammation. Allergol Int 2026;75:32-41. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  53. Alharris E, Mohammed A, Alghetaa H, et al. The Ability of Resveratrol to Attenuate Ovalbumin-Mediated Allergic Asthma Is Associated With Changes in Microbiota Involving the Gut-Lung Axis, Enhanced Barrier Function and Decreased Inflammation in the Lungs. Front Immunol 2022;13:805770. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  54. Lunjani N, Walsh LJ, Venter C, et al. Environmental influences on childhood asthma-The effect of diet and microbiome on asthma. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2022;33:e13892. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  55. Rodriguez CI, Isobe K, Martiny JBH. Short-term dietary fiber interventions produce consistent gut microbiome responses across studies. mSystems 2024;9:e0013324. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  56. Komulainen M, Saros L, Vahlberg T, et al. Maternal fish oil and/or probiotics intervention: Allergic diseases in children up to two years old. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2023;34:e14004. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  57. Meiners F, Ortega-Matienzo A, Fuellen G, et al. Gut microbiome-mediated health effects of fiber and polyphenol-rich dietary interventions. Front Nutr 2025;12:1647740. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  58. Liu Z, de Vries B, Gerritsen J, et al. Microbiome-based stratification to guide dietary interventions to improve human health. Nutr Res 2020;82:1-10. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  59. Binder N, Lederer AK, Michels KB, et al. Assessing mediating effects of high-dimensional microbiome measurements in dietary intervention studies. Biom J 2021;63:1366-74. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  60. Porcari S, Ng SC, Zitvogel L, et al. The microbiome for clinicians. Cell 2025;188:2836-44. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  61. Metris A, Walker AW, Showering A, et al. Assessing the safety of microbiome perturbations. Microb Genom 2025;11:001405. [Crossref] [PubMed]
  62. Mahdavinia M, Fyolek JP, Jiang J, et al. Gut microbiome is associated with asthma and race in children with food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023;152:1541-1549.
  63. Greathouse KL, Choudhury A. Precision nutrition and the gut microbiome: Harnessing AI to revolutionize cancer prevention and therapy. Cell Host Microbe 2025;33:766-76. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Ke L, Li S, Zhu G. Gut and respiratory microbiomes in asthma and allergic diseases: a narrative review of mechanistic insights, gut-lung axis interactions and therapeutic opportunities. Transl Pediatr 2026;15(6):243. doi: 10.21037/tp-2026-0360

Download Citation