Tortuosity index to decide stenting of the duct in patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation: a response letter
We thank Dr. Osman Baspinar for his interesting letter and his comments on our article (1).
We know that the curvature index was originally derived from mathematical and physical concepts describing waveforms and is presented as a differential equation.
We agree with the colleague and his idea that there is some confusion in medical literature between the two concepts: curvature index and tortuosity index. Many centres around the world used the concept of curvature index to express the vessel and bronchus tortuosity (2-4).
In our previous article (5), we have used the formula adopted from Qureshi et al. (2) as the following: L2-L1/L2 to express the quantitative severity of ductal tortuosity. Where L2 is the entire length of the duct and L1 is the short straight distance between the aortic origin of the duct and the insertion onto pulmonary artery. While the formula suggested from Dr. Osman for calculating the tortuosity index is L1-L2/L1 (where L1 is the entire length of duct and L2 is the short distance). In comparison between the two formulas, we find that there is no quantitative difference, and the result will be the same.
Moreover, whether we name it as ductal curvature index or ductal tortuosity index, the method for measurement and results are the same.
Our study was the first to propose a quantitative threshold for the ductal tortuosity that could be helpful to predict the outcome in high-risk patients. In addition, we have mentioned that futures studies (possibly multi-centre studies) should confirm our results or to propose another accurate threshold (5).
Finally, we hope, while now there is more interest in the subject, the arguments in future articles and meetings will increase and the best possible name will develop from this fruitful discussion.
Acknowledgments
Funding: None.
Footnote
Provenance and Peer Review: This article was commissioned by the editorial office, Translational Pediatrics. The article did not undergo external peer review.
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-22-162/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
References
- Baspinar O. How should the tortuosity index and curvature ratio be used correctly in the ductal stenting procedure? Transl Pediatr 2022; [Crossref]
- Qureshi AM, Goldstein BH, Glatz AC, et al. Classification scheme for ductal morphology in cyanotic patients with ductal dependent pulmonary blood flow and association with outcomes of patent ductus arteriosus stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019;93:933-43. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Moon DH, Park CH, Jung JH, et al. Inferior Pulmonary Ligament Division May Be Unnecessary during Left Upper Lobectomy: Effects on Lung Volume, Bronchial Angle and Bronchial Tortuosity. J Clin Med 2021;10:4033. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Han HC. Twisted blood vessels: symptoms, etiology and biomechanical mechanisms. J Vasc Res 2012;49:185-97. [Crossref] [PubMed]
- Mini N, Schneider MBE, Zartner PA. Use of the ductal curvature index to assess the risk of ductal stenting in patients with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. Transl Pediatr 2021;10:1307-16. [Crossref] [PubMed]
