Comment on the selection of the fixed or random effect model in a study
Letter to the Editor

Comment on the selection of the fixed or random effect model in a study

Yue Sun, Yinghong Guo, Jiangfeng Wu^

Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Dongyang, China

^ORCID: 0000-0002-5036-799X.

Correspondence to: Jiangfeng Wu. Department of Ultrasound, The Affiliated Dongyang Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, No. 60 Wuning West Road, Dongyang 322100, Zhejiang, China. Email: wjfhospital@163.com.

Comment on: Zhang W, Wang S, Xing Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of probiotics on feeding intolerance in preterm infants: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Transl Pediatr 2022;11:229-38.


Submitted Apr 01, 2022. Accepted for publication May 23, 2022.

doi: 10.21037/tp-22-133


We read the recent published paper by Zhang and colleagues entitled “Clinical efficacy of probiotics on feeding intolerance in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis” (1). They found that the probiotics could promote the early growth of preterm infants and effectively improve the occurrence of feeding intolerance (FI) in preterm infants. We appreciate Zhang and colleagues for the important study, however, after careful learning of the paper, we would like to pay attention to some important missing issues in the study.

In the section of the weight gain in this meta-analysis, the authors depicted that the significant heterogeneity was found among the included studies (I2=96%, P<0.00001), and no cause of heterogeneity was detected, so a random effect model was adopted. However, the authors actually used a fixed effect model for the analysis showed in Fig. 4. Furthermore, the same issues occurred in the analyses of maximum enteral feeding and time of hospital stay. Then the paper should be further revised to validate the conclusions because of the concerns above.

In short, Zhang et al. revealed a significant issue with regard to the clinical efficacy of probiotics on FI in preterm infants.


Acknowledgments

Funding: None.


Footnote

Provenance and Peer Review: This article was a standard submission to the journal. The article did not undergo external peer review.

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://tp.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/tp-22-133/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.


References

  1. Zhang W, Wang S, Xing Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of probiotics on feeding intolerance in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Pediatr 2022;11:229-38. [Crossref] [PubMed]
Cite this article as: Sun Y, Guo Y, Wu J. Comment on the selection of the fixed or random effect model in a study. Transl Pediatr 2022;11(6):1063-1064. doi: 10.21037/tp-22-133

Download Citation